Core Viewpoint - The competition in the next-generation automotive sector will be significantly influenced by software updates that enhance driving performance and functionality, with companies like Tesla and Huawei leading the charge in software innovation [1][2]. Group 1: Collaboration between Honda and Nissan - Honda and Nissan are negotiating to standardize the basic software (operating system) for vehicle control, aiming to implement it in new models by the late 2020s [1]. - The two companies have been conducting joint research on software technology since August 2024, with plans to decide on mass production development based on the effectiveness of their collaboration [1][2]. - The collaboration is driven by concerns over data competition in the next-generation automotive field, where features like autonomous driving and enhanced in-car experiences are critical [2]. Group 2: Development of Operating Systems - Honda is developing its own operating system called "ASIMO," while Nissan is also advancing its proprietary system, aiming to create user-friendly systems akin to Apple's iOS and Google's Android [2]. - Both companies plan to launch vehicles equipped with their independently developed operating systems starting in 2026, with a joint system expected to debut in new models by the late 2020s [2]. - The collaboration aims to reduce development costs, which can reach trillions of yen, by sharing resources and technology [2]. Group 3: Competitive Landscape - Tesla, a leader in the industry, utilizes its own operating system, resolving approximately 40% of recall issues through software updates [2]. - Chinese tech companies like Huawei are also at the forefront of software innovation in the automotive sector [2].

日产汽车和本田将围绕车辆软件展开合作。（日经新闻） ...

据日经新闻：本田和日产将共同开发下一代汽车的操作系统。 ...

据日经新闻：本田和日产计划在本世纪20年代末推出配备新操作系统的车辆。 ...

Core Viewpoint - Nissan and Honda are in discussions to utilize Nissan's underutilized production capacity in the U.S. to manufacture pickup trucks for Honda, aiming to enhance operational efficiency and mitigate the impact of tariffs on their businesses [1][3][4]. Group 1: Collaboration and Production Capacity - Nissan is exploring the possibility of producing large vehicles for Honda at its Canton, Mississippi plant, which currently has a low utilization rate of 57% for 2024 [3][6]. - The collaboration could benefit both companies, as Nissan seeks to improve factory utilization while Honda aims to expand its product lineup in North America [3][4]. Group 2: Tariff Implications - The U.S. is Japan's largest automotive export market, accounting for 30% of total exports, making tariffs a significant concern for Japanese automakers [5]. - Honda anticipates a 70% drop in net profit for the fiscal year 2025, largely due to the impact of tariffs, while Nissan expects a loss of 450 billion yen from the same tariff policies [5][6]. Group 3: Financial Challenges - Nissan is facing severe financial difficulties, reporting a net loss of 670.9 billion yen for the fiscal year 2024, with significant debt obligations approaching maturity [6]. - The company is undergoing a restructuring process, including plans to lay off 20,000 employees and close seven factories, while also seeking to improve cash flow by negotiating payment extensions with suppliers [6].

Core Viewpoint - Nissan and Honda are discussing collaboration to utilize Nissan's underutilized factories in the U.S. to produce vehicles for Honda, aiming to mitigate the impact of U.S. auto tariffs on Japanese automakers [1][2]. Group 1: Collaboration and Production - Nissan has begun negotiations with Honda to supply vehicles from its U.S. factories, particularly focusing on producing pickup trucks at the Canton plant in Mississippi [1][2]. - The collaboration is seen as a strategic move to increase local production and reduce the high import ratios of Japanese vehicles in the U.S., which are 47% for Nissan and 32% for Honda [2][3]. - Both companies face significant profit declines due to U.S. auto tariffs, with Honda projected to lose 650 billion yen and Nissan up to 450 billion yen in the fiscal year ending March 2026 [2]. Group 2: Market Conditions and Challenges - The Canton plant's utilization rate is projected to be only 57% in 2024, significantly below the breakeven point of around 80%, indicating a need for increased production to improve profitability [3]. - The U.S. government's strong stance on tariffs, including a 25% tariff set to take effect in April, adds pressure on Japanese automakers to enhance local production [3]. Group 3: Negotiation Dynamics - Previous discussions aimed at forming a global automotive alliance between Nissan and Honda collapsed due to disagreements, but both companies are now focusing on cooperation to rebuild their relationship [4]. - Following a management change at Nissan in April, regular discussions between the executives of both companies have resumed, although they have denied immediate plans to restart formal merger talks [4].

Group 1 - BYD reported a value of 1360.61 with a decrease of 21.7% [2] - Ferrari's value is 887.78, showing a decrease of 13.15% [2] - Mercedes-Benz has a value of 597.78, with no percentage change reported [2] - BMW's value increased by 1.19% to 566.63 [2] Group 2 - Volkswagen's value is 537.15, reflecting a decrease of 0.48% [3] - General Motors reported a value of 513.31, with an increase of 2.3% [3] - Ford's value decreased by 5.16% to 468.44 [3] - Maruti Suzuki's value is 461.17, showing a decrease of 2.36% [3] - Porsche's value decreased by 6.5% to 444.88 [3] - Mahindra Automotive's value is 441.38, with a decrease of 13.28% [3] - Honda's value is 421.94, reflecting a slight decrease of 0.55% [3] - Hyundai's value increased by 21.73% to 373.36 [3] - Stellantis reported a value of 305.14, with a decrease of 9.08% [3] - Seres' value is 296.65, showing a decrease of 4.03% [3] - Tata Motors reported a value of 294.36, with a decrease of 7.21% [3] - Kia's value increased by 3.72% to 291.71 [3] - SAIC Motor's value is 284.62, reflecting an increase of 9.68% [3] - Li Auto's value is 280.63, with an increase of 4.66% [3] - Geely's value is 227.12, reflecting an increase of 1.29% [3] - Great Wall Motors reported a value of 226.47, with a slight increase of 0.11% [3] - Suzuki Japan's value is 220.92, showing an increase of 2.36% [3] - Xpeng's value is 165.68, reflecting a decrease of 0.28% [3] Group 3 - Changan Automobile's value is 156.36, with a slight increase of 0.12% [4] - Rivian's value is 156.09, showing a decrease of 3.48% [4] - Renault's value is 138.89, reflecting a decrease of 2.23% [4] - Subaru's value is 129.85, with an increase of 1.62% [4] - JAC's value is 119.19, with an increase of 0.49% [4] - Hozon Auto's value is 105.63, showing a decrease of 1.14% [4] - Isuzu's value is 93.51, with an increase of 0.58% [4] - GAC Group's value is 88.01, reflecting a decrease of 0.83% [4] - Leapmotor's value is 85.88, with no percentage change reported [4] - Weimi Auto's value is 83.69, showing an increase of 4.51% [4] - Ford Otosan's value is 83.18, reflecting a decrease of 0.92% [4] - VinFast Auto's value is 83.03, with an increase of 0.47% [4] - Nissan's value is 75.25, reflecting an increase of 2.18% [4] - Lucid Motors' value is 69.85, showing a decrease of 1.22% [4] - Zeekr's value is 69.83, with an increase of 0.84% [4]

Group 1: Toyota - Toyota's sales in June reached 157,700 units, a year-on-year increase of 3.7% [2] - Cumulative sales for the first half of the year totaled 742,000 units, reflecting a year-on-year growth of 8.63% [2] - Toyota's strong performance is attributed to its continuous investment in electrification and intelligent technology, as well as a diverse product lineup [2] Group 2: Nissan - Nissan sold 53,800 vehicles in June, marking a year-on-year increase of 1.9%, ending a 15-month streak of declining sales [2] - Cumulative sales for the first half of the year were 279,600 units, a year-on-year decline of 21.02% [2] - The recovery in Nissan's sales is likely due to adjustments in product strategy and marketing, including new models that better meet Chinese consumer demands [2] Group 3: Honda - Honda's sales in June fell by 15.2% to 58,500 units, continuing a 17-month decline [3] - Cumulative sales for the first half of the year were 315,200 units, a year-on-year decrease of 24.2% [3] - Challenges for Honda include intensified market competition, slow product updates, and a lag in the transition to electric vehicles, impacting its competitiveness [3] Group 4: Overall Market Trends - The performance of the three major Japanese automakers in China shows a clear divergence, with Toyota maintaining growth, Nissan showing signs of recovery, and Honda facing significant pressure [2][3] - Future success in the Chinese market for these automakers will depend on their speed and effectiveness in transitioning to electrification and intelligent technologies [3]

Core Viewpoint - The joint venture automotive companies in China have shown a significant recovery in sales during the first half of 2025, with most brands experiencing growth after a challenging 2024, although some, like Honda and Nissan, continue to struggle [2][3]. Group 1: Sales Performance - In the first half of 2025, major joint venture brands, except for Honda and Dongfeng Nissan, achieved sales growth, with FAW Toyota leading at a 16% increase [2]. - FAW-Volkswagen sold 436,100 units, a 3.5% increase, while SAIC Volkswagen's sales reached 523,000 units, up 2.3% [3]. - GAC Toyota's sales grew by 11%, and SAIC GM saw an 8.6% increase, marking a turnaround from previous declines [2][3]. Group 2: Fuel Vehicle Recovery - Several joint venture companies relied on fuel vehicles for recovery, with FAW-Volkswagen's fuel vehicle market share increasing by 0.7 percentage points to 7.6% [3]. - The sales of classic fuel models like the Lavida and Sagitar contributed significantly to the overall sales increase [3]. - GAC Toyota's fuel models, such as the Camry and Highlander, saw a 30% increase in sales [3]. Group 3: Electric Vehicle Challenges - Despite the recovery in fuel vehicle sales, joint venture brands continue to struggle in the electric vehicle (EV) sector, with a mere 5.3% penetration rate for mainstream brands compared to 75.4% for domestic brands [3][4]. - The overall market share for joint venture brands in the EV segment remains low, with only a few models like Volkswagen's ID series and Toyota's bZ series performing relatively well [4]. Group 4: Strategic Adjustments - Analysts attribute the sales rebound to strategic adjustments, particularly in enhancing the intelligence of fuel vehicles through partnerships with domestic tech companies [5][6]. - Joint venture brands are increasingly localizing their management and product development to better cater to Chinese consumers [7]. Group 5: Pricing Strategies - Many joint venture brands have shifted from aggressive price competition to a "reduce volume to maintain price" strategy, stabilizing terminal prices and improving dealer confidence [8]. - The introduction of fixed pricing models has also helped reduce consumer hesitation and increased foot traffic [8]. Group 6: Future Outlook - Despite the positive sales trends, joint venture brands face a challenging future, with predictions of market share declining from 40% to 10% over the next few years [9][10]. - The need for a robust electric vehicle strategy is critical, as many brands are reconsidering their electric vehicle timelines and focusing on maintaining profitability in the fuel vehicle market [10][11].

Group 1 - Nissan will supply pickup trucks produced at its Mississippi plant to Honda [1]