Mastercard has teamed with self-service payment portal Pay4You on a spend management solution for European companies.By completing this form, you agree to receive marketing communications from PYMNTS and to the sharing of your information with our sponsor, if applicable, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions .Complete the form to unlock this article and enjoy unlimited free access to all PYMNTS content — no additional logins required.The collaboration, announced Monday (July 7), emp ...

Group 1: Web3 Companies and Market Trends - Antalpha and Circle successfully listed on Nasdaq and NYSE, with first-day stock price increases of 70% and 168%, indicating high investor confidence in Web3 infrastructure and stablecoin businesses [1] - Coinbase's upcoming inclusion in the S&P 500 index marks a significant step in integrating Web3 into mainstream financial asset allocation, likely driving capital inflow and enhancing valuation stability [1] - The trend suggests that leading Web3 companies are increasingly meeting the transparency, profitability, and regulatory compliance required for public companies, potentially attracting traditional financial institutions and institutional investors [1] - Guotai Junan International became the first to receive approval from the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission, significantly expanding its business scope and achieving a nearly 200% stock price surge [1] - Investors should focus on the future product deployment and customer expansion capabilities of brokerage firms involved in virtual asset businesses [1] - Companies like Coinbase and Ripple are exploring banking licenses to standardize their stablecoin, custody, and payment capabilities into traditional financial services [1] - Web3 companies are evolving from mere technology providers to new financial infrastructure operators in the digital economy, opening up greater commercial model and valuation opportunities [1] - The U.S. has incorporated digital assets into its national financial development plan, with regulatory bodies restructuring rules to balance innovation encouragement and risk control [1] - This trend indicates a reduction in policy risks for Web3 companies, with mid-to-long-term valuations likely receiving institutional support, especially for compliant leading firms [1] Group 2: Stablecoin Market Dynamics - Stablecoins have evolved from tools for hedging and on-chain payments in the crypto ecosystem to a new infrastructure for global cross-border payments, settlements, and digital finance [2] - The total market capitalization of stablecoins surged from $650 million to over $250 billion in six years, a growth of over 380 times, with projected transaction volumes reaching $27 trillion in 2024, surpassing Visa and Mastercard [2] - The stablecoin industry is undergoing a structural shift from being "Web3 native" to being dominated by "Web2 giants," reshaping the entire payment market landscape [2] - Mastercard is actively participating in building infrastructure rather than just collaborating with crypto companies, co-developing compliant on-chain card purchase processes with Chainlink, Zerohash, and Swapper [2] - By integrating stablecoins like FIUSD into its global payment network, Mastercard is addressing the conversion pain points between fiat and on-chain assets, enhancing user experience and capital efficiency [2] - Mastercard's support for merchants to choose stablecoins as settlement currencies breaks the long-standing fiat payment monopoly, significantly optimizing cross-border settlement experiences [2] - Companies like JD.com, Ant Group, and Fiserv are not just using existing stablecoins but are applying for regulatory licenses to create their own stablecoins for core business services [2] - Fiserv's FIUSD is designed for financial institutions and merchants, aligning with the current demand for "programmable dollars," while JD.com aims to reduce cross-border logistics payment costs by 90% [2] - Monitoring whether these companies can shift their revenue structure from "platform fees" to "settlement fees" and "clearing service fees" is crucial, as this may represent new profit growth points [2] Group 3: Regulatory Developments and Market Implications - The U.S. GENIUS Act, the EU's MiCA, and regulatory sandboxes in Singapore and Hong Kong have opened compliance pathways for stablecoin issuance, making "licenses" a scarce financial resource for the next phase [3] - Meta plans to integrate stablecoins into WhatsApp and Instagram, enabling "chat-to-transfer" functionalities, while eight major banks in South Korea have formed a stablecoin alliance to provide lower-threshold international financial services for SMEs [3] - These cases indicate a trend where stablecoins are becoming the preferred pathway for Web2 products to enter the Web3 space, serving as the most compliant and lowest user-threshold "on-chain entry" [3] Group 4: Investment Opportunities in Traditional Financial Institutions - Guotai Junan Securities (Hong Kong) partnered with HashKey to issue tokenized securities "GF Token," creating a fusion path between digital assets and traditional securities [4] - The Hong Kong stock market has formed a closed-loop cooperation between "compliant brokerages" and "on-chain issuance platforms," indicating that the traditional financial system is opening interfaces to the virtual asset system [4] - Chinese brokerages with first-mover advantages are expected to receive structural valuation reassessment opportunities, with virtual asset-related revenues (custody, trading, issuance) likely becoming new profit sources [4] - The combination of fundamental turning points and increased policy support is expected to drive Chinese brokerages from "cyclical valuation recovery" to "structural profit improvement," leading to a more sustained performance-driven market [4]

Investors might want to bet on MasterCard (MA) , as it has been recently upgraded to a Zacks Rank #2 (Buy). An upward trend in earnings estimates -- one of the most powerful forces impacting stock prices -- has triggered this rating change.A company's changing earnings picture is at the core of the Zacks rating. The system tracks the Zacks Consensus Estimate -- the consensus measure of EPS estimates from the sell-side analysts covering the stock -- for the current and following years.The power of a changing ...

Market Capitalization Summary - Oracle has a market capitalization of 806.88 billion, while Visa stands at 655.99 billion [2] - Procter & Gamble has a market capitalization of 378.02 billion, and ExxonMobil is at 512.70 billion [2] - Mastercard's market capitalization is 470.87 billion, and Bank of America is at 375.11 billion [2] - UnitedHealth has a market capitalization of 308.53 billion, while ASML is at 310.77 billion [2] - Coca-Cola's market capitalization is 295.75 billion, and T-Mobile US Inc is at 273.60 billion [2] Stock Performance - Oracle's stock increased by 0.46 (+0.47%), while Visa's rose by 0.47 (+0.13%) [2] - Procter & Gamble's stock saw a slight increase of 2.68 (+0.48%), while ExxonMobil's stock increased by 1.92 (+1.20%) [2] - Mastercard's stock increased by 1.46 (+1.35%), and Bank of America's stock rose by 3.15 (+2.06%) [2] - UnitedHealth's stock decreased by 11.21 (-1.40%), while ASML's stock increased by 0.93 (+1.31%) [2] - Coca-Cola's stock increased by 14.05 (+4.50%), and T-Mobile US Inc's stock rose by 3.31 (+1.39%) [2] Additional Company Insights - McDonald's has a market capitalization of 212.78 billion, while AT&T is at 207.73 billion [3] - Uber's market capitalization is 192.79 billion, and Verizon's is at 184.08 billion [3] - Caterpillar's market capitalization is 183.87 billion, while Qualcomm is at 174.99 billion [3] - BlackRock has a market capitalization of 163.25 billion, and Citigroup is at 161.13 billion [3] - Boeing's market capitalization is 158.16 billion, while Pfizer is at 142.36 billion [3] Recent Market Movements - Intel's stock increased by 0.45 (+1.99%), while Dell Technologies rose by 0.82 (+0.16%) [4] - Rio Tinto's market capitalization is 746.07 billion, and Newmont is at 654.78 billion [4] - General Motors has a market capitalization of 494.87 billion, while Target is at 472.00 billion [4] - Ford's market capitalization is 451.14 billion, and Valero Energy is at 432.26 billion [4] - Vodafone's market capitalization is 241.45 billion, while Pinterest is at 270.30 billion [5]

Core Viewpoint - MasterCard is positioned well to continue its trend of beating earnings estimates in upcoming quarterly reports [1][5]. Group 1: Earnings Performance - MasterCard has a strong history of beating earnings estimates, with an average surprise of 4.14% over the last two quarters [2]. - In the most recent quarter, MasterCard reported earnings of $3.57 per share against an expectation of $3.73, resulting in a surprise of 4.48% [2]. - For the previous quarter, the consensus estimate was $3.68 per share, while the actual earnings were $3.82 per share, leading to a surprise of 3.80% [2]. Group 2: Earnings Estimates and Predictions - Estimates for MasterCard have been trending higher, influenced by its history of earnings surprises [5]. - The stock has a positive Zacks Earnings ESP of +1.24%, indicating increased analyst optimism regarding its near-term earnings potential [8]. - The combination of a positive Earnings ESP and a Zacks Rank of 3 (Hold) suggests a strong possibility of another earnings beat [8]. Group 3: Earnings ESP Insights - Stocks with a positive Earnings ESP and a Zacks Rank of 3 or better have a nearly 70% chance of producing a positive surprise [6]. - The Zacks Earnings ESP compares the Most Accurate Estimate to the Zacks Consensus Estimate, reflecting the latest analyst revisions [7]. - A negative Earnings ESP does not necessarily indicate an earnings miss, but it reduces predictive power [8].

Core Viewpoint - The article compares Paypal (PYPL) and MasterCard (MA) to determine which stock is more attractive to value investors, highlighting that PYPL has a stronger earnings outlook and better valuation metrics than MA [1][3]. Valuation Metrics - PYPL has a forward P/E ratio of 14.62, significantly lower than MA's forward P/E of 35.17, indicating that PYPL may be undervalued compared to MA [5]. - The PEG ratio for PYPL is 1.23, while MA's PEG ratio is 2.45, suggesting that PYPL offers better value when considering expected earnings growth [5]. - PYPL's P/B ratio stands at 3.57, in stark contrast to MA's P/B ratio of 76.51, further supporting the notion that PYPL is more attractively valued [6]. Investment Grades - PYPL currently holds a Zacks Rank of 2 (Buy), while MA has a Zacks Rank of 3 (Hold), indicating a stronger investment outlook for PYPL [3]. - Based on the valuation figures and earnings outlook, PYPL is rated with a Value grade of B, whereas MA has a Value grade of D, reinforcing PYPL's position as the superior value option [6].

Summary of Key Points from the Research Report Industry Overview - The report focuses on the payments ecosystem, particularly the impact of stablecoins on cross-border payments and the competitive landscape involving major players like Visa (V), Mastercard (MA), and Corpay (CPAY) [1][2]. Core Insights 1. **Stablecoins and Cross-Border Payments**: - Stablecoins do not provide significant speed or cost advantages for most cross-border flows, as G10 currencies dominate these transactions, making them already efficient [2]. - 80%+ of cross-border flows involve G10 currencies, with spreads in highly liquid currency pairs being as low as <1 basis point [2]. 2. **Last-Mile Conversion Issues**: - Stablecoins fail to address the last-mile conversion into fiat currency, which is essential for payments to be deposited into bank accounts [2]. - 95% of CPAY's cross-border revenue is linked to foreign exchange (FX) conversion, primarily in G20 currencies [2]. 3. **Business Adoption of Stablecoins**: - There is a growing willingness among consumers in volatile currency markets to hold stablecoins, but businesses still require local fiat for operations [2]. - The risk lies in businesses becoming more comfortable with holding balances in stablecoins [2]. 4. **FX Conversion Spreads**: - Spreads on FX conversion into exotic currencies are unlikely to compress with the rise of stablecoins, as liquidity remains a critical factor [2]. - In some markets, converting stablecoins can be more expensive than traditional currency conversions [2]. 5. **Disintermediation Risks**: - The disintermediation of traditional providers like CPAY in favor of crypto-native providers is deemed unlikely, as existing providers have established customer relationships and can integrate stablecoins more seamlessly [2]. 6. **Treasury Management Efficiency**: - Stablecoins can enhance treasury management and pre-funding of accounts in local markets, potentially improving margins [2]. 7. **Peer-to-Peer Remittance**: - Stablecoins may reduce basis risk for peer-to-peer remittance companies, potentially lowering consumer pricing by minimizing the time gap between fund availability and settlement [2]. 8. **Consumer Payment Risks**: - There is little belief that stablecoins pose a significant risk to Visa and Mastercard in consumer payments, as the current payment systems are convenient and secure [2]. Company-Specific Insights - **Corpay, Inc. (CPAY)**: - Price target set at $375 based on approximately 15x FY26E EPS estimate. Risks include fuel price volatility, FX fluctuations, regulatory changes, and competition [4]. - **Mastercard, Inc. (MA)**: - Price target set at $655 based on approximately 35x CY26E EPS estimate. Risks include macroeconomic factors, consumer spending, regulatory issues, and competition [5]. - **Payoneer Global Inc. (PAYO)**: - Price target set at $8.50 based on approximately 12x FY26 adjusted EBITDA estimate. Risks include macroeconomic conditions, consumer spending, competition, customer concentration, fraud, and data security [6]. - **Visa, Inc. (V)**: - Price target set at $410 based on approximately 32x FY26E EPS estimate. Risks include macroeconomic factors, consumer spending, regulatory issues, and competition [7]. Additional Considerations - The report highlights a significant investor interest in the payments sector, particularly regarding stablecoins and their implications for traditional payment systems [3]. - The analysis emphasizes the importance of understanding the liquidity dynamics and regulatory environment surrounding stablecoins and traditional payment methods [2][4][5][6][7].

Core Viewpoint - Mastercard has been found in violation of European competition law for imposing excessive interchange fees, which restrict competition and lack justification, similar allegations are faced by Visa [1][10] Group 1: Legal and Financial Implications - The ruling exposes Mastercard to significant financial liability as U.K. retailers can seek damages, potentially leading to sizable payouts for both Mastercard and Visa [2][4] - The U.K. Payment Systems Regulator may impose stricter oversight and cap interchange fees across the industry due to rising card fees [2] - A trial is ongoing to determine if merchants passed these costs onto consumers, with both Mastercard and Visa expected to appeal the decision [3] Group 2: Competitive Landscape - Legal and competitive pressures, including the rise of fintech disruptors, may challenge the duopoly of Mastercard and Visa, although their robust business models and profitability remain strong [5] - Merchant interest in alternatives like stablecoins is likely to grow, as they offer lower transaction fees and faster settlements, potentially impacting Mastercard's market share [6] Group 3: Company Developments - PayPal launched its stablecoin, PYUSD, in August 2023, and is registered with the Financial Conduct Authority in the U.K., indicating readiness for expansion [7] - Mastercard has launched its Multi-Token Network and piloted USDC settlements to integrate blockchain into its payment system [8] Group 4: Financial Performance and Valuation - Mastercard shares have gained 4.5% year to date, outperforming the broader industry's growth of 3.2% [9] - The company trades at a forward price-to-earnings ratio of 31.81X, which is higher than the industry average, and carries a Value Score of D [12] - The Zacks Consensus Estimate for Mastercard's 2025 earnings implies a 9.5% rise year over year, followed by 16.7% growth in the subsequent year [13]

2025年6月24日，万事达宣布与Chainlink（区块链预言机网络，旨在弥合链下数据与链上智能合约 之间的差距）建立战略合作伙伴关系。有分析认为，这意味着传统支付网络正主动上"链"，在不拆 解合规架构的前提下，将 DeFi（去中心化金融）纳入自身轨道。 现在，一个用户无需理解区块链即可体验链上经济价值、推动Web3.0（基于区块链去中心化的第 三代互联网）从"极客工具"向"大众金融基础设施"转型的支付裂变时刻已至。 金融业正在经历"链改"而非"被颠覆"，最终是否会形成一种 混合型金融服务生态：底层是区块链技术作为新金融基础设 施；中间层是合规框架下的加密资产纳入主流体系；应用层则 由传统金融机构主导。 作者：欧阳晓红 封图：图虫创意 想 象 一 下 ： 2025 年 的 夏 天 ， 在 纽 约 一 家 咖 啡 馆 ， 一 位 年 轻 的 软 件 工 程 师 用 手 中 的 万 事 达 （Mastercard）信用卡轻轻一刷，购买了0.25枚以太坊。他既没有登录加密货币交易平台Binance 或Coinbase，也无需复制粘贴复杂的钱包地址，只是在一个名叫Swapper Finance（兑换者金融） 的小程 ...

Core Insights - Mastercard is transforming the payment landscape by enabling users to purchase cryptocurrencies directly using their credit cards through a new service called Swapper Finance, in partnership with Chainlink [1][2][3] - This collaboration signifies a shift where traditional payment networks are integrating decentralized finance (DeFi) without dismantling existing compliance structures [1][5] Group 1: Strategic Partnerships - Mastercard has partnered with major cryptocurrency platforms like MetaMask, Crypto.com, and Kraken, allowing users to spend stablecoins at 150 million merchants globally [2][3] - The partnership with Chainlink aims to provide a secure bridge between off-chain data and on-chain smart contracts, facilitating seamless transactions [3][4] Group 2: User Experience and Accessibility - Users can now purchase cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and stablecoins directly from decentralized exchanges (DEX) using their Mastercard, simplifying the process that previously required multiple steps [3][6] - The new system allows for a straightforward transaction process: input card number, select amount, and confirm payment, making it accessible to a broader audience [7][8] Group 3: Regulatory and Compliance Framework - The collaboration emphasizes compliance, consumer protection, and transparency, ensuring that on-chain activities are visible and off-chain identities are compliant [6][9] - The integration of stablecoins into mainstream payment channels represents a significant step towards bridging traditional finance and decentralized finance [5][10] Group 4: Future Implications - The partnership may signal a new era in digital currency competition, focusing on ecosystem connectivity rather than just payment efficiency [9] - The evolving landscape suggests a potential hybrid financial ecosystem where traditional financial services leverage blockchain technology for enhanced functionality [10]