ORLD BANK GROUP 6 R UE 2024 ★ GHANA RBON Public Disclosure Authorized ublic Disclosure Authorized ublic Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized © 2024 The World Bank Group 1818 H Street NW, Washington DC 20433 Telephone: 202-473-1000 | Internet: www.worldbank.org Disclaimer The content of this report does not reflect the official opinion of the project sponsors or their partner organization. Responsibility for the information and views expressed therein lies entirely with the authors. Please cite ...

Investment Rating - The report indicates a strong commitment to mobilizing private sector solutions for development, with a record investment of $56 billion in fiscal year 2024, including over $22 billion mobilized from partners [3][24][31]. Core Insights - The World Bank Group is enhancing its operational effectiveness to address intertwined global challenges such as poverty, climate change, and food insecurity, with a commitment to provide electricity access to 300 million people in Africa by 2030 [4][16]. - The IFC is focusing on innovative financial instruments and partnerships to boost private sector investment in emerging markets, aiming to increase annual guarantee issuance to $20 billion by 2030 [10][38]. - The report emphasizes the importance of digital transformation, with a digital lending portfolio totaling $5.6 billion as of June 2024, aimed at establishing the foundations of a digital economy in developing countries [17][19]. Summary by Sections Leadership Perspectives - The leadership highlights the need for a better bank to tackle pressing global challenges and emphasizes the importance of partnerships with the private sector [4][10][20]. Results - The World Bank Group committed $117.5 billion in fiscal 2024, with $31.7 billion from IFC, reflecting a significant increase in financing to address development needs [4][56]. - The IFC's net income for fiscal 2024 was $1.485 billion, with total assets amounting to $108.187 billion [58]. Strategy in Action - The IFC is channeling 45% of its annual financing to climate action by 2025, focusing on both mitigation and adaptation efforts [15][7]. - The report outlines the establishment of the Private Sector Investment Lab to address barriers to private sector investment in emerging markets [38][39]. Critical Functions - The report discusses the Global Emerging Markets Risk Database (GEMS) Consortium, which aims to enhance transparency and mobilize private investment in emerging markets [39]. - The Knowledge Compact for Action is introduced as a strategy to leverage knowledge and expertise in crafting development plans [40][41].

Investment Rating - The report does not explicitly provide an investment rating for the Australian general insurance industry Core Insights - Australian general insurers are facing challenges such as frequent natural disasters, rising claims costs, and regulatory scrutiny, which are impacting their financial performance and making insurance less affordable for consumers [2][4] - To improve productivity, insurers should consider three major levers: enhancing labor productivity, improving IT productivity, and optimizing third-party spending [5][10] Summary by Sections Industry Challenges - The underwriting costs for general insurers have increased by approximately 20% over the last seven years due to climate risks and the need for compliance and technology modernization [3] - Costs have risen by about 20% for incumbents and 37% for international insurers, while challenger businesses have seen costs more than double [4][6] Productivity Levers - Insurers are expected to focus on efficiency and productivity improvements over the next three to five years, learning from global peers [5] - The three primary levers identified for driving productivity are: 1. **Labor Productivity**: Aligning 50-60% of the cost base to global best practices can lead to productivity improvements of 20-40% through zero-based redesign and strategic partnerships [11][12] 2. **IT Productivity**: Targeting 20-30% of the cost base through technology modernization and simplification can yield significant productivity gains [15][17] 3. **Third-Party Spend**: Optimizing procurement and external spending can target an additional 10-20% of the cost base [10][15] Implementation Strategies - Effective performance management is crucial for translating strategy into action, with global insurers demonstrating success through ambitious targets and visibility of key performance indicators [18] - Insurers are encouraged to ask critical questions regarding their productivity strategies and the role of technology in enhancing efficiency [18]

WORLD BANK GROUP EALTH TAXES A series on Fiscal Policy & Health Knowledge Note Saving Lives while Raising Revenue: Opportunities in Brazil's reform of indirect taxes to improve Tobacco, Alcohol, and Sugar-Sweetened Beverages Excise Taxes Disclosure Auth olic Disclosure Autho | --- | --- | |--------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ...

olic Disclosure Auth The regulation of platform-based work: Recent regulatory initiatives and insights for developing countries olic Disclosure Authoriz olic Disclosure Autho Disclosyre Authoriz Maho Hatayama Dagmara Maj-Swistak ORLD BANK GROUP Table of Contents Executive Summary 6 1. Introduction 8 2. How are labor regulations adapted to protect platform-based work? 11 3. What can we learn from specific regulatory attempts? 14 3.1. Classifying employment status for platform-based work 14 3.2. Improving wor ...

Investment Rating - The report does not explicitly provide an investment rating for the industry. Core Insights - The report identifies three broad categories of cybersecurity risks associated with AI code generation models: 1) generating insecure code, 2) models being vulnerable to attacks, and 3) downstream cybersecurity impacts [2][4][26]. Summary by Sections Executive Summary - Recent advancements in AI, particularly large language models (LLMs), have enhanced the ability to generate computer code, which presents both opportunities and cybersecurity risks [2][12]. Introduction - AI code generation models are increasingly adopted in software development, with a significant percentage of developers using these tools [10][11]. Background - Code generation models include specialized models for coding and general-purpose LLMs, which have seen rapid improvements and adoption in recent years [14][15]. Increasing Industry Adoption of AI Code Generation Tools - The adoption of AI coding tools is driven by productivity gains, with studies indicating that developers can complete tasks significantly faster when using these tools [23][25]. Risks Associated with AI Code Generation - The report highlights the risks of insecure code generation, model vulnerabilities, and potential downstream impacts on cybersecurity as these models become integral to the software supply chain [26][27]. Code Generation Models Produce Insecure Code - Research indicates that a substantial percentage of code generated by AI models contains vulnerabilities, with various studies showing rates of insecure code ranging from 40% to over 70% [29][30][69]. Models' Vulnerability to Attack - AI models are susceptible to various types of attacks, including data poisoning and backdoor attacks, which can compromise their outputs [33][35]. Downstream Impacts - The increasing reliance on AI-generated code may shift the vulnerability landscape, potentially leading to new classes of vulnerabilities and impacting future model training [39][40]. Challenges in Assessing the Security of Code Generation Models - Evaluating the security of AI-generated code is complicated by factors such as programming language differences, model types, and the lack of standardized assessment tools [41][42]. Evaluation Results - The evaluation of five AI models revealed a high rate of unsuccessful verification, with approximately 48% of generated code snippets containing bugs [64][69]. Policy Implications and Further Research - The report emphasizes the need for proactive policy measures to address the cybersecurity risks associated with AI-generated code, including the responsibility of AI developers and organizations to ensure code security [83][84][86].

Investment Rating - The report does not explicitly provide an investment rating for the industry Core Insights - The Foundational Learning Compact (FLC) aims to strengthen education systems and improve learning outcomes globally, particularly in low- and middle-income countries [40][41] - The FLC has catalyzed approximately $16.5 billion in funding through the World Bank, benefiting over 36 million students and 5 million teachers across 86 countries [78][79] - The report emphasizes the urgency of addressing learning poverty, which risks significant future economic losses estimated at $21 trillion [17][20] Summary by Sections Trust Fund Overview and Highlights - The FLC supports foundational learning, focusing on literacy, numeracy, and socio-emotional skills as essential for overall educational development [80] - The FLC has awarded 39 catalytic grants totaling around $21 million to 29 countries, with a significant increase in disbursements by nearly 20% compared to the previous period [46][47] Implementation Progress - The Accelerator Program has set learning targets and developed Investment Cases in several countries, enhancing accountability and likelihood of achieving learning outcomes [32][54] - The FLC has produced 57 country briefs using data from the Progress in International Reading Literacy Study 2021, supporting national learning assessment systems [33][62] Risks and Challenges - The report does not provide specific details on risks and challenges Looking Ahead - Future activities will continue to focus on improving foundational learning outcomes, with an emphasis on collaboration with global education partners [42][43] Trust Fund Financials - The FLC has leveraged significant funding from various donors, including the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and the UK Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office [48][50]

Investment Rating - The report does not explicitly provide an investment rating for the industry. Core Insights - The report emphasizes the importance of valuing water as a natural capital asset to enhance economic understanding and policy-making related to water resources [11][12][16]. - It identifies three approaches for estimating the value of water: asset-by-asset, use-by-use, and service-by-service, with the service-by-service approach being the most feasible at the required scale [11][12][16]. - The report highlights the need for improved data and methodologies to generate reliable estimates of water value, which is currently underrepresented in national wealth accounts [11][12][16]. Summary by Sections Introduction - Water consumption is increasing globally due to population growth and economic development, while availability is affected by climate change and declining quality [11]. - The report aims to assess the feasibility of valuing water in at least 150 countries for inclusion in the Changing Wealth of Nations (CWON) [11][12]. Water Valuation Options - Three approaches to water valuation are discussed: 1. **Asset-by-Asset**: A bottom-up assessment based on the trade of water-related assets, currently limited by data availability [12]. 2. **Use-by-Use**: A bottom-up approach assessing water use across various industries, requiring detailed country-level data [12]. 3. **Service-by-Service**: A top-down approach estimating the value of water-related ecosystem services, which is currently the most feasible method [12][16]. Data Sources and Methods - The report discusses the need for comprehensive data sources and methods to improve water valuation estimates, emphasizing the integration of environmental and economic data [11][12][16]. - It suggests that partnerships and collaborations could enhance data collection and methodological innovation for water valuation [12][16]. Next Steps - The report proposes a combination of bottom-up and top-down approaches to advance water valuation efforts, aiming for reliable estimates for 150 countries [12][16].

Investment Rating - The report does not explicitly provide an investment rating for the industry Core Insights - Paraguay has made significant progress in reducing poverty, halving its poverty rate from 51.4% in 2003 to 24.7% in 2022, and extreme poverty from 12.6% to 5.6% during the same period [22][43] - The pace of poverty reduction has slowed since 2014, with most gains occurring between 2003 and 2013, and recent adverse shocks have impacted progress [23][47] - In 2023, Paraguay saw a reduction in moderate poverty by 2.8 percentage points and extreme poverty by 1.2 percentage points, indicating signs of recovery [23][51] Overview of the Challenge - Despite significant poverty reduction, spatial disparities persist, with rural areas experiencing higher poverty rates [22][42] - The Gini coefficient for income inequality was 45 points in 2022, indicating a higher level of inequality compared to structural peers [23] - Vulnerable groups include the young, women, low-educated individuals, informal workers, and Indigenous communities, who face higher poverty rates [23][24] Factors Limiting Poverty Reduction - **Human Capital**: Paraguay faces significant human capital deficits, with low educational outcomes and health disparities affecting poverty reduction efforts [26][27] - **Job Quality**: High labor informality (63% in 2022) and poor job quality hinder access to quality employment [28] - **Fiscal System**: The fiscal system's limited impact on poverty reduction is due to low tax collection and inefficiencies in public spending [29] - **Climate Vulnerability**: Low-income households are particularly vulnerable to climate shocks, which can exacerbate poverty [30] Strategies for Inclusive Growth - **Human Capital Accumulation**: Prioritize early childhood education and improve access to quality education, especially for marginalized communities [32] - **Job Creation**: Implement policies to enhance job creation in formal sectors and improve access to quality jobs [33] - **Fiscal Policy**: Enhance the progressivity of the tax system and improve targeting of social transfers to lower-income households [34] - **Climate Resilience**: Develop strategies to increase resilience to climate shocks, including investment in infrastructure and disaster risk management [36] Proposed Policies and Interventions - Short-term policies include expanding early childhood education and stimulating job creation in micro, small, and medium enterprises (MSMEs) [39] - Medium- to long-term policies focus on attracting foreign direct investment (FDI) and enhancing vocational training aligned with market needs [40]

Investment Rating - The report does not explicitly provide an investment rating for the off-grid solar sector, but it emphasizes the sector's potential to electrify over 363 million people and its growth trajectory, indicating a favorable outlook for investment opportunities [18][37]. Core Insights - Off-grid solar systems are identified as the least-cost solution to achieve Sustainable Development Goal 7 (SDG7) by 2030, with a market value of approximately $2.8 billion in 2022, recovering from COVID-19 disruptions [18][37]. - The report highlights the significant environmental and social (E&S) risks associated with e-waste generated from off-grid solar systems, particularly from batteries and other components, which can have severe health and environmental impacts if not managed properly [19][20][42]. - A circular economy approach is recommended to minimize e-waste generation, emphasizing the 5Rs: reduce, reuse, repair, refurbish, and recycle, which can be integrated throughout the product lifecycle [21][30]. Summary by Sections 1. The Off-Grid Solar Sector - The off-grid solar sector serves approximately 490 million people, with a significant portion gaining access through pay-as-you-go financing, and is projected to connect an additional 363 million people by 2030 [37]. - The sector consists of four main market segments: solar lanterns, solar home systems, productive uses of renewable energy, and public facility electrification [37][38]. 2. Off-Grid Solar E-Waste Landscape Scan - The report identifies challenges in the OGS e-waste management sector, including a complicated reverse supply chain and the prevalence of poor-quality products, which contribute to e-waste accumulation [20][52]. - Good practices in e-waste management are highlighted, including quality assurance standards and partnerships with recycling firms [22][23]. 3. Environmental & Social Risk Management Guidelines - A step-by-step process for identifying and managing E&S risks related to off-grid solar e-waste is outlined, including conducting situation analyses and developing mitigation strategies [25][26]. - Key risk management strategies range from low-cost interventions to more ambitious actions requiring significant investment [26][27]. 4. The Way Forward for Off-Grid Solar E-Waste Management - The report emphasizes the need for stakeholders to pursue a diversified agenda to achieve circularity in the off-grid solar sector, including regulatory support and investment in infrastructure [31][32]. - The toolkit aims to assist World Bank teams in analyzing E&S risks and aligning with the World Bank Environmental and Social Framework [32][34].