Stock Classification - Market capitalization is a common way to classify stocks, representing the total monetary value of a company's outstanding shares [2][3] - Large-cap stocks, with market capitalization greater than $10 billion, tend to be stable with lower volatility and high dividend yields [4] - Small-cap stocks, with market capitalization under $2 billion, have potential for rapid expansion but carry more risk [5] - Mid-cap stocks offer a balance between stability and growth opportunities [6] Investment Styles - Value stocks trade at a price below their intrinsic value, offering potential opportunities [8] - Growth stocks are expected to have rapid intrinsic value growth, justifying their current market price [9][10] - Dividend stocks are from established companies that distribute profits as dividends, providing a steady income stream [10][11] Investment Vehicles - Mutual funds are portfolios managed by professionals, offering diversification but with management fees [12][13][14] - ETFs (Exchange-Traded Funds) are static baskets of stocks, providing diversification without active management fees [14][15]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the perceived lack of resilience of Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) during market downturns, highlighting skepticism from certain analysts regarding its performance in adverse conditions [1]. Group 1: Analyst Perspective - The analyst, known as The Barnacle, emphasizes a quantitative approach to investing, valuing mathematical analysis over traditional sell-side research, which he considers subpar [1]. - The Barnacle's investment strategy includes a focus on value stocks with growth potential across various market capitalizations, including large caps, midcaps, small caps, international stocks, gold miners, and REITs [1]. - Recent efforts have shifted towards ETF strategies that aim to outperform the overall market returns or offer enhanced risk protection, moving away from individual stock analysis [1].

Core Insights - The article discusses the perceived lack of resilience of Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) during market downturns, highlighting skepticism from certain analysts regarding its performance in adverse conditions [1]. Group 1: Analyst Perspective - The analyst, known as The Barnacle, emphasizes a quantitative approach to investing, valuing mathematical analysis over traditional sell-side research, which he considers subpar [1]. - The Barnacle's investment strategy includes a focus on value stocks with growth potential across various market capitalizations, including midcaps, small caps, and international stocks, as well as sectors like gold mining and REITs [1]. Group 2: Investment Strategy - The current focus is on ETF strategies that aim to outperform the overall market returns or provide enhanced risk protection, moving away from individual stock investments [1].

Core Insights - The Oakmark Global Select Fund's portfolio includes significant holdings in major companies such as Alibaba Group (4.6%), Alphabet Cl A (4.3%), and CNH Industrial (5.1%) as of September 30, 2025 [3] Fund Performance and Structure - The fund's performance data reflects past performance, which may not guarantee future results, and includes total return calculations that factor in share price changes and reinvestment of dividends [2] - The fund's portfolio is concentrated in a relatively small number of stocks, which can lead to higher volatility and greater impact on net asset value from individual securities [12] Investment Strategy - The fund's investment strategy may involve a value investment style, focusing on large- and mid-cap securities that exhibit value characteristics across developed markets [8] - The MSCI World Index and MSCI World Value Index serve as benchmarks for measuring the fund's performance against global equity markets [7][8] Risk Factors - Investing in foreign securities presents unique risks, including currency fluctuations, different regulations, and political risks, which may be greater than those associated with U.S. investments [13]

Core Insights - BJ's Restaurants (BJRI) has a stronger Zacks Rank of 2 (Buy) compared to Chipotle Mexican Grill (CMG) which has a Zacks Rank of 3 (Hold) indicating a better earnings outlook for BJRI [3] - Value investors are interested in various valuation metrics to determine if a company is undervalued at its current share price levels [3][4] Valuation Metrics - BJRI has a forward P/E ratio of 14.52, significantly lower than CMG's forward P/E of 34.01, suggesting BJRI may be undervalued [5] - BJRI's PEG ratio is 1.04, while CMG's PEG ratio is 2.09, indicating BJRI has a more favorable growth outlook relative to its price [5] - BJRI's P/B ratio is 1.78 compared to CMG's P/B of 15.54, further supporting the notion that BJRI is undervalued [6] - Based on these metrics, BJRI holds a Value grade of A, while CMG has a Value grade of D, reinforcing BJRI's position as the better option for value investors [6]

Core Viewpoint - Investors are evaluating Adtalem Global Education (ATGE) and Lincoln Educational Services Corporation (LINC) for potential undervalued stock opportunities in the Schools sector [1] Valuation Metrics - ATGE has a forward P/E ratio of 18.58, while LINC has a forward P/E of 28.49 [5] - ATGE's PEG ratio is 1.24, compared to LINC's PEG ratio of 1.90, indicating ATGE may be more favorably valued considering expected earnings growth [5] - ATGE's P/B ratio is 3.73, while LINC's P/B ratio is 3.76, suggesting similar valuations in terms of market value to book value [6] Investment Outlook - Both ATGE and LINC have a Zacks Rank of 2 (Buy), indicating a positive earnings outlook due to favorable analyst estimate revisions [3] - ATGE has a Value grade of B, while LINC has a Value grade of C, suggesting ATGE is currently the superior value option based on these metrics [6][7]

RT Akshay BD (@akshaybd)list on the stock exchange to tap passive flowstokenize on solana to tap active flowsbeen talking about this for a while, but i think active is going to make a fierce comeback. most of crypto is active anyway.imo we're at- peak US valuations v. int'l- peak growth v. value- peak passive v. activethe pendulum will swing back on all 3.going into the next cycle, solana just needs to win mkt share on international equities, value stocks and active strategies. these are somewhat immature r ...

Core Viewpoint - Investors in the Medical - Instruments sector should consider Fresenius (FMS) and Orthofix (OFIX) for potential value opportunities, with FMS currently showing stronger indicators for value investment [1]. Valuation Metrics - Fresenius has a Zacks Rank of 1 (Strong Buy), indicating a more favorable earnings estimate revision trend compared to Orthofix, which has a Zacks Rank of 3 (Hold) [3]. - FMS has a forward P/E ratio of 11.80, significantly lower than OFIX's forward P/E of 26.24, suggesting that FMS may be undervalued [5]. - The PEG ratio for FMS is 0.61, while OFIX's PEG ratio is 2.62, indicating that FMS is expected to grow earnings at a more favorable rate relative to its price [5]. - FMS has a P/B ratio of 0.96, compared to OFIX's P/B of 1.22, further supporting the notion that FMS is undervalued relative to its book value [6]. Investment Outlook - The improving earnings outlook for FMS enhances its attractiveness as a value investment, positioning it as the superior option compared to OFIX based on current valuation metrics [7].

Core Viewpoint - Solid Power (NASDAQ: SLDP) is identified as a compelling investment opportunity, with the stock having gained significantly since early July [1]. Company Overview - Solid Power operates in the battery technology sector, focusing on solid-state batteries, which are considered a key innovation for electric vehicles and energy storage solutions [1]. Investment Rationale - The stock has shown a positive performance, indicating strong market interest and potential for future growth [1]. - The investment philosophy emphasizes thorough research and a long-term perspective, which aligns with the company's innovative approach in a rapidly evolving industry [1]. Market Position - The company is positioned to benefit from the increasing demand for advanced battery technologies, particularly in the electric vehicle market [1].

Core Viewpoint - The article compares General Dynamics (GD) and Northrop Grumman (NOC) to determine which stock is a better undervalued investment option in the Aerospace - Defense sector [1] Group 1: Company Rankings and Earnings Outlook - General Dynamics has a Zacks Rank of 2 (Buy), while Northrop Grumman has a Zacks Rank of 3 (Hold) [3] - GD has seen a stronger improvement in its earnings outlook compared to NOC [3][7] Group 2: Valuation Metrics - GD has a forward P/E ratio of 22.39, whereas NOC has a forward P/E of 23.86 [5] - GD's PEG ratio is 2.09, while NOC's PEG ratio is significantly higher at 6.12 [5] - GD's P/B ratio stands at 3.89, compared to NOC's P/B of 5.6 [6] - These metrics contribute to GD receiving a Value grade of B, while NOC has a Value grade of C [6]