NEW YORK, Aug. 15, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- Kuehn Law, PLLC, a shareholder litigation law firm, is investigating whether certain officers and directors of Dick's Sporting Goods, Inc. (NYSE: DKS) breached their fiduciary duties to shareholders. According to a federal securities lawsuit, Insiders at Dick's Sporting Goods caused the company to misrepresent or fail to disclose that (i) demand for products in DKS's Outdoor segment was slowing faster than represented, resulting in excess inventory; (ii) the "structur ...

Core Points - A shareholder class action lawsuit has been filed against 3D Systems Corporation, alleging that the company made materially false and misleading statements regarding its business and operations [1] - The lawsuit claims that 3D Systems understated the impact of weakened customer spending and overstated its resilience in challenging industry conditions [1] - Additionally, the updated milestone criteria in the United Partnership are said to negatively impact the revenue of the Company's Regenerative Medicine Program [1] Legal Information - Shareholders who purchased shares of 3D Systems between August 13, 2024, and May 12, 2025, and experienced significant losses are encouraged to discuss their legal rights [2] - The deadline to request to be appointed lead plaintiff in the case is August 12, 2025 [3] - Holzer & Holzer, LLC is a law firm specializing in securities litigation and has a history of recovering significant amounts for shareholders affected by corporate misconduct [3]

Core Viewpoint - Kuehn Law, PLLC is investigating potential breaches of fiduciary duties by certain officers and directors of Open Lending Corporation, following allegations of misrepresentation and failure to disclose critical financial information [1][2]. Group 1: Allegations of Misrepresentation - Insiders at Open Lending allegedly caused the company to misrepresent or fail to disclose key aspects of its financial health, including risk-based pricing models and profit share revenue [2]. - The company reportedly failed to disclose that its 2021 and 2022 vintage loans had significantly decreased in value compared to their outstanding loan balances [2]. - There are claims regarding the underperformance of the company's 2023 and 2024 vintage loans, which contributed to misleading positive statements about the company's business and prospects [2]. Group 2: Legal Action and Shareholder Rights - Kuehn Law is reaching out to shareholders who purchased LPRO shares prior to February 24, 2022, to inform them of their potential rights and the limited time available to enforce those rights [3]. - The firm emphasizes the importance of shareholder participation in maintaining the integrity of financial markets [4].

NEW YORK, May 28, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Kuehn Law, PLLC, a shareholder litigation law firm, is investigating whether certain officers and directors of Integral Ad Science Holding Corp. (NASDAQ: IAS) breached their fiduciary duties to shareholders. According to a federal securities lawsuit, Insiders at Integral Ad Science caused the company to misrepresent or fail to disclose that (i) that IAS was experiencing a new material trend of increased competitive pricing pressures and that, as a result, IAS had b ...

Core Viewpoint - Kuehn Law, PLLC is investigating potential breaches of fiduciary duties by officers and directors of Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc. (NYSE: SEI) towards shareholders [1] Group 1: Allegations Against Solaris Energy - A federal securities lawsuit claims that insiders at Solaris misrepresented or failed to disclose critical information regarding Mobile Energy Rentals LLC (MER), including its lack of corporate history in mobile turbine leasing [2] - The lawsuit alleges that MER did not have a diversified earnings stream and that its co-owner was a convicted felon with a history of turbine-related fraud allegations [2] - As a result of these issues, Solaris is accused of overstating the commercial prospects of acquiring MER and inflating profitability metrics by not properly depreciating its turbines [2] - Positive statements made by Solaris about its business, operations, and prospects are claimed to be materially misleading and lacking a reasonable basis [2]