整理 | 褚杏娟 很多开发者开始吐槽和弃用 Cursor。 Stately.ai 的工程师 David K 用一张图形象展示了自己最近使用 Cursor 的心情： 他的帖子下面几乎都是开发者们附和的声音： "没错。我设法多少摆脱了一些这种情况，不光靠'威胁'模型，还有来回切换模式。"VibeCraft 工程师 Carlos Galarza 说道。 Web 工程师 Tom Byrer 吐槽道，"我让 Cursor 使用某个仓库的最新版本，它却安装了一个 6 个月前的版本，漏掉了 60 个更新。我发给它 GitHub 仓库链 接，结果它用了 4 个月前的版本。我发了 NPM 项目的页面链接，它还是用了 4 个月前的版本。" 以下是我至今为止的使用历程，全部来自我的账单记录和客服邮件： 初始发布阶段 ：Pro 版每月 $20，提供无限制的代码补全和（后续上线的）智能体。没有隐藏限额，也没有其他幺蛾子。 与此同时，官网也悄悄删掉了 200 美元 Ultra 套餐的"无限"标注。但 Cursor 的帮助文档没有更新，官方也完全没有任何说明。Reddit 的 r/Cursor 版块和 Discord 中揭露这些变动的帖子 ...

Core Insights - Lovable has achieved the fastest growth rate in the software industry, surpassing notable companies like OpenAI and Cursor [1][26] - The launch of Lovable Agent, a next-generation product, aims to significantly enhance productivity and reduce error rates by 91% [3][15] - Lovable targets non-coders, enabling them to create functional products using natural language descriptions, rather than traditional coding [6][16] Company Overview - Lovable is a non-typical AI programming tool company, focusing on users who do not write code, unlike competitors such as Cursor or Claude Code [6] - The company was founded in Sweden in 2023 with an initial team of 45 employees [22] - Lovable has recently completed a significant A-round funding of $200 million, raising its valuation to $1.8 billion and achieving a revenue milestone of over $100 million [24] Product Development - Lovable Agent represents a shift from a one-time execution model to an iterative, error-correcting approach, functioning more like a collaborative AI employee [8][15] - The new version allows for the use of external tools to perform complex tasks, enhancing its capabilities beyond simple code generation [11][12] - The product's design enables users to create applications without needing to understand programming languages or frameworks [16][17] Market Position - The AI programming tools market is projected to grow from $4.86 billion in 2023 to $26 billion by 2030, with a compound annual growth rate of nearly 30% [19][23] - Lovable's rapid ascent to a $100 million annual revenue in just eight months is unprecedented in the software industry [26] - The competitive landscape includes various domestic and international products aimed at non-coders, indicating a crowded market [29]

Core Viewpoint - Anysphere's AI programming tool Cursor faced user backlash due to a pricing adjustment, leading to CEO Michael Truell's public apology and a commitment to refund affected users [1][4] Pricing Adjustment - On June 16, Cursor changed its Pro plan from a flat monthly fee of $20 for 500 fast replies to a usage-based model, charging users based on API rates after reaching the $20 limit [3] - Users expressed dissatisfaction on social media, particularly regarding the rapid depletion of usage limits when using advanced AI models like Anthropic's Claude [3] Communication Issues - Truell acknowledged significant communication failures regarding the pricing changes, admitting that the lack of clarity surprised many users [4] - The company plans to improve communication about pricing changes in the future [4] Cost Factors - The pricing adjustment was driven by rising costs associated with advanced AI models, which require more tokens per request due to their complexity [4] - Despite some AI model prices decreasing, the most advanced models remain expensive, with Anthropic's Claude Opus 4 charging $15 per million input tokens and $75 per million output tokens [4] Industry Trends - OpenAI and Anthropic have begun charging enterprise clients additional "priority access" fees, contributing to rising costs in the AI programming tools sector [5] - Cursor, as a leading AI product, generates over $500 million in annual recurring revenue (ARR) but faces intense competition from both AI model providers and other programming tools [5] Competitive Landscape - Anthropic's new AI programming tool Claude Code has gained popularity among enterprise users, increasing its ARR to $4 billion, potentially impacting Cursor's user base [5] - To maintain its market position, Cursor has signed long-term agreements with major AI model providers and introduced a new $200 monthly plan, Cursor Ultra, offering higher usage limits [6]

Core Viewpoint - Windsurf, an AI programming platform, is facing significant challenges due to Anthropic's abrupt cut-off of its Claude 3.x model access, which may impact its user capacity and overall service delivery [2][3][13]. Group 1: Company Developments - Windsurf was recently reported to be acquired by OpenAI for $3 billion, gaining considerable attention in the industry [1]. - CEO Varun Mohan expressed concerns over Anthropic's decision to limit access to its models, which could harm not only Windsurf but the entire industry [7][8]. - Despite the challenges, Windsurf has launched an emergency plan allowing access to Claude Sonnet 4 through self-provided keys [4]. Group 2: User Impact and Service Adjustments - Users may experience capacity issues with Claude 3.x models in the short term until new capacities are established, but overall service is expected to gradually improve [5]. - Windsurf has stopped providing direct access to Claude 3.x models for free users but has introduced a BYOK (Bring Your Own Key) option for accessing these models [5]. Group 3: Competitive Landscape - Anthropic's recent actions suggest a shift in strategy, as it aims to compete directly in the AI programming space with its own applications like Claude Code [20][21]. - Windsurf's transition from GPU virtualization to AI programming tools highlights its evolution in the competitive landscape, emphasizing deep collaboration between developers and AI [23]. Group 4: Financial Performance and Growth - Windsurf has shown strong growth, with an annual recurring revenue (ARR) exceeding $100 million and a user base of over 1 million within four months [24]. - The company has introduced its own AI model, SWE-1, which performs comparably to existing models while being more user-friendly and cost-effective [16][17]. Group 5: Industry Context - The recent disruptions in model access reflect broader industry dynamics, where companies like Windsurf rely on stable, callable large model interfaces to deliver their services [26]. - The ongoing situation raises questions about whether AI products will prioritize foundational models or focus on user experience and ecosystem integration [29].

Core Insights - Windsurf has announced a significant price reduction to enhance competitiveness against Cursor, claiming to provide "huge savings" for users [1] - The company has eliminated its complex "flow action points" system and reduced team package pricing from $35 to $30 per user per month, with enterprise packages also seeing substantial price cuts [1] - Windsurf's product marketing manager highlighted the improved GPU efficiency, asserting that Windsurf now offers the best and most cost-effective pricing structure among AI programming tools [1] Group 1 - Windsurf is reportedly being considered for acquisition by OpenAI at a valuation of $3 billion, while Cursor's creator Anysphere is negotiating funding at a $10 billion valuation [2] - Windsurf's annual recurring revenue is approximately $100 million, compared to Cursor's $300 million [2] - OpenAI initially aimed to acquire Cursor, but due to its rapid growth, Cursor currently has no intention to sell [2] Group 2 - Although Windsurf has not confirmed the acquisition rumors, it has recently strengthened its public collaboration with OpenAI [3] - Windsurf's CEO appeared in a video for OpenAI's latest API model release, and the company is offering users an additional week of free unlimited access to OpenAI's latest GPT-4.1 and o4-mini models [3] - A key concern is whether Cursor will respond to Windsurf's pricing innovations with its own price cuts, potentially leading to a price war that could hinder profitability for both startups [3] Group 3 - Windsurf reiterated its commitment to passing cost savings back to users, a promise made from the beginning [4]

Windsurf 产品营销经理 Rob Hou 在 X 平台宣称，通过优化 GPU 使用效率， Windsurf 如今拥有 " 市场上所有 AI 编程工具中最佳且最具性价比的定价结构 " 。 Hou 批评竞争对手 20 美元 / 月的定价方案 " 令人困惑 " ，暗指 Cursor 个人月费计划起价 20 美元，而 Windsurf 同类产品仅需 15 美元。 此次价格调整之际，有报道称 Windsurf 正被 OpenAI 以 30 亿美元的价格考虑收购（ Cursor 的创建者 Anysphere 正在谈判以 100 亿美元的估值进行融 资）。据 TechCrunch 此前报道， Windsurf 是两家编程助手初创公司中规模较小的一家，年经常性收入约为 1 亿美元，而 Cursor 为 3 亿美元。 OpenAI 最 初希望收购 Cursor ，但后者增长迅猛，目前并无出售意向。 尽管 Windsurf 尚未确认 OpenAI 的收购传闻，但近期已加强与 OpenAI 的公开合作。 例如， Windsurf 的CEO Varun Mohan 本月早些时候，出现在 OpenAI 最新 API 模型系列的发 ...