Core Argument - The rule of law, encompassing principles like equality before the law and judicial independence, is crucial for a country's prosperity and institutional growth [5][14] - The document contrasts the "rule of law" with "rule by law," where law is used as a tool for power consolidation, highlighting the dangers of the latter [8][10] - The author emphasizes the importance of constitutional awareness and civic duties, especially among young people, to ensure government accountability and prevent crises [12][13] Pakistan's Context - Pakistan's constitution, particularly the 1973 version, inherently includes the rule of law, yet the country has faced constitutional crises and instances of "rule by law" [6][7] - The Objectives Resolution of 1947-1949 emphasized Pakistan as an Islamic republic with republican democracy, protection of minority rights, and guaranteed judicial independence [6] - Erosion of judicial independence, such as parliamentary selection of top judges, undermines the separation of powers and the rule of law in Pakistan [8][9] Global Implications - The American system of checks and balances and separation of powers serves as a model for constitutions worldwide [3][5] - Countries that disregard the rule of law face a bleak future, as exemplified by recent examples in Nepal, Sri Lanka, and Bangladesh [10] - The youth, informed by social media, play a vital role in upholding the rule of law and holding governments accountable [11][12]

From @WSJopinion: Some radical groups are abusing the nonprofit system to support criminal activity. A small reform could improve nonprofit transparency consistent with the rule of law, writes @tal_fortgang.https://t.co/xfduxGfSso ...

My first instinct when I see a politically-motivated arrest in a country is to see if USAID has set up a "Rule of Law" program there to capture its judges and prosecutors, and so far my instinct has never been wrong https://t.co/ZnjReysynOMike Benz (@MikeBenzCyber):How USAID's "Rule of Law" programs activate to arrest the State Department's political adversaries in Moldova https://t.co/LzRgYN21m8 ...

How USAID's "Rule of Law" programs activate to arrest the State Department's political adversaries in Moldova https://t.co/LzRgYN21m8 ...

Core Argument - The rule of law is essential for individual and national growth in India [9] - Implementing the rule of law, though challenging, leads to justice, organizational confidence, and public trust [26][27][28] - Upholding the law is a collective responsibility that fosters justice, equality, liberty, fraternity, fairness, merit, talent, and growth [29][30] Social Justice and Legal System - The legal system should ensure equality before the law, protecting individual liberty from arbitrary power [7] - Social justice litigation can address fabricated charges, workplace harassment, and lack of compensation for vulnerable populations [4] - The rule of law is crucial to counterbalance the influence of powerful and privileged individuals or entities [5][6] Practical Implementation and Challenges - Implementing the rule of law can face opposition, even when it ultimately benefits the community [19][20] - Enforcing the rule of law, even in small instances, can significantly change community dynamics and foster confidence [24][25] - Police training emphasizes the importance of doing the impossible and pushing beyond perceived limitations to uphold the law [18] Impact and Outcomes - Implementing the rule of law leads to tangible improvements, such as smoother traffic flow, reduced accidents, and decreased crime rates [21] - When the rule of law is applied with integrity, justice prevails, fostering a sense of confidence within organizations [26] - Public trust is rejuvenated when grievances are resolved according to the law, making the police station a place where people feel heard [27][28]

PROTECTS US FROM A WOULD BE TYRANT. >> LET'S BREAK THIS DOWN NOW WITH MSNBC JUSTICE AND INTELLIGENCE REPORTER KEN DILANIAN IN WASHINGTON. HERE IN NEW YORK, OUR SENIOR LEGAL REPORTER LISA RUBIN, AND FORMER ASSISTANT MANHATTAN DISTRICT ATTORNEY REBECCA ROIPHE, ALSO WITH US, NEW YORK TIMES CHIEF WHITE HOUSE CORRESPONDENT AND MISS NOW CONTRIBUTOR PETER BAKER.KEN, ASSUMING THE DOJ DOES APPEAL, ATHEY'VE STATED THES PROCEED. >> WELL, GOOD MORNING, ANNA. AS YOU SAID, JUDGE CAMERON CURRIE RULED THAT THE APPOINTMENT ...

I'm grateful that the court ended the case against me, which was a prosecution based on malevolence and incompetence and a reflection of what the Department of Justice has become under Donald Trump, which is heartbreaking. But I was also inspired by the example of the career people who refused to be part of this travesty. It cost some of them their jobs, which is painful, but it preserved their integrity, which is beyond price.And I know they will serve again. I was very lucky that some of the best lawyers ...

Donald Trump's pursuit of retribution against his perceived political enemies, which is facing the harsh reality of the rule of law. At this moment, not one, not two, but three different judges are not not only looking at separate issues that could very well result in the dismissal of the Justice Department's case against former FBI Director James Comey, but the judges have all appeared skeptical of the DOJ's defense in each case. Those include the very appointment of Lindseay Halligan as the interim US att ...

Nigerian Foreign Minister Yusuf Tuggar underscored his government’s commitment to religious freedom and the rule of law, pushing back against Donald Trump’s claim about the alleged killing of Christians https://t.co/6BZaGh5QFL ...

Rule of Law & Judicial Independence - The judiciary is facing immense pressure as it confronts a president potentially seeking excessive power and defying constitutional term limits [2] - Lower courts are actively working to uphold constitutional democracy and documenting its dismantling, creating a legal and historical record [2] - Lower court judges are pushing back against unlawful power grabs, reasserting the judiciary's duty to check presidential overreach [3] - Judges are warning against militarizing civilian life and standing up for state sovereignty, resisting the misuse of emergency appeals [3] - Courts are establishing a record by expressing disbelief and distrust towards the government, challenging its power [4] Political & Historical Context - The normalization of the idea that Donald Trump will remain president after the 2028 election is a concern [1] - There is a coordinated effort to purge inconvenient facts from the American story, including the truth about the 2020 election and January 6th [4] - The administration is attempting to rewrite American history to substitute it with one man's preferred narrative [4] Defense of Democracy - Judges are bearing witness at a critical moment in American history, contributing to the broader resistance to authoritarianism [4] - American judges create the official record, the legal, factual, historical account, as a safeguard against the rewriting of history [4] - The federal courts play a crucial role in upholding truth and preventing the denial and rewriting of history, which is essential for the survival of America [5]