RT X Freeze (@amXFreeze)Grokipedia stays updated with real-time edits powered by GrokAutomated fact-checks happen with no human bias and no errorsGrok pursues the Truth so you get the facts https://t.co/4zLUjkAtud ...

How to fix mistakes in GrokipediaDogeDesigner (@cb_doge):You can fix mistakes in Grokipedia easily.Just highlight the text, tap “It’s Wrong,” and send your correction. https://t.co/h5GUTnIENQ ...

RT Grummz (@Grummz)Just browsing multiple topics on Grokipedia...everything controversial.It's so much more fair than Wikipedia. No...wait...it wipes Wikipedia on the floor and stomps on it.Wikipedia's key flaw is that it only allows "approved sources" which are all controlled and ideologically captured media, plus a small number of "super editors" who are super biased control everything.it's not perfect. It doesn't cite everything and it gives equal light to both sides, sometimes that will anger people whe ...

RT Chamath Palihapitiya (@chamath)Go search for your favorite topics. This is a really good start and, imo, almost equal to Wikipedia already on the topics covered. This will be obviously better than Wikipedia within a year… ...

Cool. I’m reading these for the first time btw.Grok generated about 1M articles using a lot of compute.You will be able to ask Grok to add/modify/delete articles and it will either take the action or tell you it won’t and why.Grummz (@Grummz):Grokipedia clears Gamergate, tells the truth.It's never been told like this before. It's more than fair. It documents nearly everything.While it does not report the bomb threats and doxing that Gamergate received (with receipts), and does not challenge the claims of Sa ...

The goal of Grok and https://t.co/op5s4ZikGJ is the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth.We will never be perfect, but we shall nonetheless strive towards that goal.Dillon Loomis (@DillonLoomis22):Note the difference between Wikipedia's first paragraph on George Floyd compared to the first paragraph from Grokipedia. The nuance and detail on Grokipedia is FAR superior to Wikipedia and is clearly not pushing any ideologies, unlike Wikipedia. Corrections like this are https://t.co/NoTnLq2pxe ...

https://t.co/op5s4ZikGJ is fully open source, so anyone can use it for anything at no cost ...

Banger 🎯😂Lee (Greater) (@shortmagsmle):Actually, obligatory:Two economists are walking in a forest when they come across a pile of shit.The first economist says to the other “I’ll pay you $100 to eat that pile of shit.”The second economist takes the $100 and eats the pile of shit.They continue walking until ...

RT Nayib Bukele (@nayibbukele)It’s nice to be a verb. https://t.co/ffMnZ1IlEE ...

GrokipediaLuis Batalha 🇵🇹🇺🇸 (@luismbat):Here's a fun exercise: pick a big topic and read through the "Edits" on Grokipedia.For example, Wikipedia claimed a Type I civilization uses ~10²⁶ W instead of ~10¹⁶ W. Surprising how many long-standing mistakes like this there are. https://t.co/mvG5GK1lev ...