Core Viewpoint - Hagens Berman is notifying investors about a pending securities class action against F5, Inc. due to allegations of misleading statements regarding the security of its BIG-IP products, which resulted in significant financial losses for investors [1][2]. Group 1: Allegations and Impact - The lawsuit claims that F5 executives misled the market about the security of its core products, particularly after a sophisticated nation-state threat actor allegedly gained long-term access to F5's systems and exfiltrated sensitive source code [2][9]. - Following the revelation of the security breach in October 2025, F5's market value plummeted by over $2 billion, with stock prices experiencing significant declines [2][4]. - The breach led to a disappointing revenue guidance cut for 2026, which was attributed to the security incident, resulting in a drop of F5 shares by $22.83, or 7%, the day after the announcement [9]. Group 2: Legal Proceedings and Investor Actions - The lead plaintiff deadline for the class action is set for February 17, 2026, covering the class period from October 28, 2024, to October 27, 2025 [4][5]. - Hagens Berman is actively investigating the claims and advising investors who purchased F5 shares during the class period and suffered losses [5][6]. - The firm is also encouraging whistleblowers with non-public information regarding F5 to come forward, as they may be eligible for rewards under the SEC Whistleblower program [6].

Core Viewpoint - Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP is investigating potential claims against Smart Digital Group Limited due to allegations of securities law violations, urging affected investors to take action before the March 16, 2026 deadline [2][4]. Group 1: Legal Investigation - The law firm is encouraging investors who suffered losses exceeding $50,000 in Smart Digital between May 5, 2025, and September 26, 2025, to contact them for legal options [1]. - A federal securities class action has been filed against Smart Digital, with a deadline for investors to seek the role of lead plaintiff by March 16, 2026 [2][5]. Group 2: Allegations Against Smart Digital - The complaint alleges that Smart Digital and its executives made false and misleading statements, failing to disclose involvement in a market manipulation scheme [4]. - Specific allegations include the use of social media misinformation, insider trading through offshore accounts, and omissions regarding the risks of fraudulent trading that could lead to trading suspensions by the SEC and NASDAQ [4]. - The misleading statements about the company's business and operations have been highlighted as materially deceptive [4]. Group 3: Firm Background - Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP is a prominent national securities law firm with a history of recovering hundreds of millions of dollars for investors since its establishment in 1995 [3]. - The firm has offices in New York, Pennsylvania, California, and Georgia, indicating a broad operational footprint [3].

Core Viewpoint - Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP is investigating potential claims against Ramaco Resources, Inc. due to allegations of violations of federal securities laws, specifically regarding misleading statements about the company's mining activities and development progress [2][4]. Group 1: Legal Investigation - The law firm is encouraging Ramaco investors who suffered losses exceeding $50,000 to contact them for discussing legal options [1]. - A federal securities class action has been filed against Ramaco, with a deadline of March 31, 2026, for investors to seek the role of lead plaintiff [2][5]. - The complaint alleges that Ramaco and its executives made false statements and failed to disclose significant information regarding the Brook Mine, including the lack of significant mining activity and overstated development progress [4]. Group 2: Company Background - Ramaco Resources, Inc. is publicly traded on NASDAQ under the ticker METC [2]. - Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP has a history of recovering hundreds of millions of dollars for investors since its establishment in 1995 [3].

Core Viewpoint - Ocado, a British technology and online grocery group, is planning to cut up to 1,000 jobs, which represents approximately 5% of its workforce, as part of a renewed cost-cutting initiative following a challenging year for its automated warehouse business [1] Group 1 - The job cuts are part of a broader strategy to reduce costs within the company [1] - The decision comes after a difficult year for Ocado's automated warehouse operations, indicating operational challenges [1]

Core Insights - The weight loss drug market is shifting focus from injectables to pills, with Eli Lilly performing exceptionally well, showing a 10% increase in stock value and strong sales growth [1][3] - Novo Nordisk's stock has declined following disappointing earnings, with sales growth down by 5% to 13%, equating to a $1.5 billion shortfall compared to expectations [4][10] - Eli Lilly is gaining market share and has a robust pipeline for future drugs, while Novo Nordisk is facing challenges, including a new CEO and cost-cutting measures [8][10] Company Performance - Eli Lilly's sales margins are reported at 40%, indicating strong profitability and market positioning [3] - Novo Nordisk's earnings have decreased, leading to a significant divergence in stock performance compared to Eli Lilly [4][10] - Eli Lilly's stock is trading at higher valuation multiples, with 26-27 times earnings compared to Novo's 13 times, suggesting a premium for Eli Lilly's growth prospects [10] Market Dynamics - The competition in the GLP-1 market is increasing, leading to price reductions and impacting margins for companies like Novo Nordisk [7] - The need for ongoing treatment with GLP-1 drugs is becoming apparent, as many patients require continuous use to maintain weight loss [6] - The overall market is experiencing volatility, with concerns about potential declines in major tech stocks affecting investor sentiment [14][16]

Core Insights - Coupang, Inc. experienced a significant drop in share price, falling over 13% due to a report of an additional 165,000 user data being leaked, compounding the previously reported breach affecting 33 million users [1][2] Company Developments - The interim CEO, Harold Rogers, is under investigation by South Korean authorities for potential perjury related to statements made about the data breach during a National Assembly hearing [2] - The investigation focuses on Rogers' claims that the cybersecurity incident was directed by the Korean government, which the government has denied [2] - Following the breach revelations, Coupang's share price has seen a severe decline since late November 2025 [2] Legal Actions - A securities class action lawsuit has been initiated to represent investors who acquired Coupang securities between May 7, 2025, and December 16, 2025, encouraging affected investors to report their losses [3][4] - The lawsuit alleges that Coupang misled investors by promoting "proactive security" measures while failing to detect a significant data breach for nearly six months, which affected 33.7 million accounts [4] - The breach was reportedly executed by a former employee using authentication keys that remained valid post-departure, leading to a $1.2 billion compensation plan and a CEO resignation, resulting in over $8 billion in market value loss [4] Company Statements - On December 29, 2025, Coupang filed a report with the SEC stating that its investigation was conducted under government direction, which may contradict earlier statements made by the interim CEO [5] - The firm Hagens Berman is leading the investigation into the claims and is encouraging whistleblowers with non-public information to come forward [6]

Core Insights - The Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) and the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) are designed to track large-cap U.S. stock performance, with MGK focusing on the largest growth companies and VOO tracking the full S&P 500 [1] Cost & Size Comparison - VOO has a lower expense ratio of 0.03% compared to MGK's 0.05% - VOO offers a higher dividend yield of 1.11% versus MGK's 0.36% - VOO has a significantly larger asset under management (AUM) of $839 billion compared to MGK's $32 billion [2] Performance & Risk Analysis - Over the past five years, MGK has provided a higher total return, growing $1,000 to $1,846, while VOO grew to $1,782 - MGK has a maximum drawdown of -36.02%, which is deeper than VOO's -24.53% - MGK's beta of 1.17 indicates greater price volatility compared to VOO's beta of 1.00 [3] Portfolio Composition - MGK consists of 60 stocks, with a heavy allocation of 55% in technology and 17% in communication services, with top holdings in Nvidia, Apple, and Microsoft - VOO holds 504 stocks, reflecting the sector weights of the S&P 500, with a more diversified portfolio including significant exposure to financial services and consumer cyclical sectors [4][5] Investment Implications - MGK targets mega-cap stocks, defined as those with a market cap of at least $200 billion, while VOO offers broader diversification that may mitigate volatility [6] - VOO's lower tech allocation (around 35%) compared to MGK's (55%) may result in less severe drawdowns during tech downturns [7] - A more concentrated portfolio like MGK's can lead to higher long-term earnings potential, but it also carries the risk of underperformance from individual stocks [8] - Investors willing to accept higher risk for potential higher returns may find MGK appealing, while those seeking stability may prefer VOO [9]

Core Viewpoint - The Sprott Gold Miners ETF (SGDM) and iShares Gold Trust (IAU) provide different strategies and risk profiles for investors seeking exposure to gold, with SGDM focusing on gold mining companies and IAU tracking the spot price of gold directly [1]. Cost & Size - SGDM has an expense ratio of 0.50%, while IAU is more affordable at 0.25% [2][3]. - As of February 7, 2026, SGDM has a one-year return of 137.07%, significantly higher than IAU's 72.60% [2]. - SGDM has assets under management (AUM) of $718.12 million, compared to IAU's $78 billion [2]. Performance & Risk Comparison - SGDM has a maximum drawdown of -45.05% over five years, while IAU's data is not available [4]. - The growth of a $1,000 investment over five years is $2,735 for SGDM and $2,690 for IAU, indicating similar long-term performance [4]. Portfolio Composition - IAU is designed to track the spot price of gold, providing direct exposure to physical bullion and serving as a low-cost vehicle for gold price exposure [5]. - SGDM has a concentrated portfolio of 43 gold mining companies, with top holdings including Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd., Newmont Corp., and Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. [6]. Investor Considerations - Investing in precious metals ETFs like SGDM and IAU involves heightened volatility compared to stock-based ETFs, especially during economic and geopolitical turbulence [7]. - Gold prices can fluctuate sharply, benefiting investors as international entities increase their gold reserves amid a weakening U.S. dollar [8]. - While SGDM has outperformed IAU in the short term, both ETFs show nearly identical price returns over a five-year span, making SGDM potentially more suitable for investors uncomfortable with an ETF that only holds gold [9].

Group 1 - Citi analyst Jeff Chung has assigned a value to XPeng's robot business [1]

Core Insights - AT&T is recognized as a solid company with strong dividend payments, but it is not considered a growth stock despite expected profit improvements in the near future [1] Group 1: Business Growth Drivers - The primary driver of AT&T's anticipated growth is its fiber-optic broadband segment, which has seen significant investment, including a recent $5.8 billion acquisition of Lumen's fiber business [4] - AT&T plans to expand its fiber service footprint to over 40 million customer locations by the end of this year, marking a 25% increase from 32 million locations at the end of 2025 [4] Group 2: Revenue Composition - Approximately 70% of AT&T's revenue is derived from wireless services, while less than 15% comes from fiber-optic connectivity for consumers and businesses [5] - Despite being a smaller segment, the fiber business is projected to be a significant profit growth engine, with 40% of consumers who can subscribe to AT&T's broadband service doing so [6] Group 3: Customer Growth Potential - An additional 8 million locations are expected to lead to 3.2 million new paying broadband customers, increasing the customer base from 10.6 million to 13.6 million, representing a 30% growth [6] - The average fiber customer pays around $73 per month, which could result in nearly $3 billion in additional annual revenue [6] Group 4: Financial Projections - AT&T's CFO provided guidance indicating adjusted EPS is expected to be in the range of $2.25 to $2.35 by 2026, with a projected double-digit compound annual growth rate (CAGR) through 2028 [7] - Analysts predict a low-double-digit growth rate for AT&T's per-share profits, estimated to increase by just over 10% annually through 2028 [7]