New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - February 7, 2026) - WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, announces a class action lawsuit on behalf of purchasers of securities of Picard Medical, Inc. (NYSE American: PMI) between September 2, 2025 and October 31, 2025, inclusive (the "Class Period"). A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than April 3, 2026 in the securities class action first filed by the Firm. SO WHAT ...

New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - February 7, 2026) - WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds purchasers or acquirers of senior notes by Oracle Corporation (NYSE: ORCL) issued pursuant and/or traceable to the Shelf Registration Statement filed with the SEC on March 15, 2024, and as supplemented on September 25, 2025 (together, the "Offering Documents"), of the New York State class action lawsuit filed on their behalf. SO WHAT: If you purchased or acquired Oracle senior notes you ...

Core Viewpoint - Precious metals serve as a hedge against the U.S. dollar, with iShares Silver Trust (SLV) and VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) providing distinct exposure to silver and gold mining equities respectively [1][2] Cost & Size - SLV has an expense ratio of 0.50% and assets under management (AUM) of $47.32 billion, while GDX has an expense ratio of 0.51% and AUM of $30.77 billion [3] - Both ETFs have similar expense ratios, making annual fees negligible for most investors, but only GDX offers dividends [4] Performance & Risk Comparison - Over the past year, SLV returned 139.15% while GDX returned 137.31% [3] - SLV experienced a maximum drawdown of -37.65% over five years, compared to GDX's -46.52% [5] - An investment of $1,000 would have grown to $3,174 in SLV and $2,852 in GDX over five years [5] Portfolio Composition - GDX focuses on gold mining equities, holding 55 companies, with major positions in Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd., Newmont Corp., and Barrick Mining Corp., which together make up nearly 25% of the portfolio [6] - SLV provides direct exposure to silver prices without holding individual companies, making it a pure commodity play [7] Investment Implications - SLV is linked to the volatility of silver, which is estimated to be three times more volatile than gold, presenting significant risks [8] - GDX, while less volatile than SLV, still carries some market volatility risks, making both ETFs suitable for investors willing to accept such risks [9] - Precious metals typically rise in price during periods of U.S. dollar weakness or international economic instability, making both ETFs attractive options [10]

Ford Motor Company - Ford is shifting away from all-electric vehicles (EVs) and will no longer produce an all-electric version of its popular F-150 truck, focusing instead on lower-priced EVs and hybrids [1][3] - This strategic change will incur a one-time charge of $19.5 billion but is expected to align the auto lineup with customer demand and potentially lead to stronger profits in the long term [3] - Ford's stock is currently trading near 52-week highs, with a price-to-earnings ratio above its five-year average, indicating that it may not be an attractive option for value investors [4] Rivian Automotive - Rivian is preparing to launch the R2, a lower-priced EV truck model aimed at expanding sales and achieving sustainable profitability [6][8] - The company has sufficient cash to bring the R2 to market by 2026, but consumer demand for the vehicle remains uncertain until it is available for sale [8] - Given the significance of the R2 launch, conservative investors may prefer to wait for sales results before investing, while aggressive investors might also hold off due to the product's importance [9] Investment Outlook - Currently, neither Ford nor Rivian stocks are considered strong buys, with potential changes in investment attractiveness depending on Ford's stock price movements or the success of Rivian's R2 launch [10]

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased Beyond Meat, Inc. securities between February 27, 2025, and November 11, 2025, of the upcoming lead plaintiff deadline for a class action lawsuit on March 24, 2026 [1]. Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who bought Beyond Meat securities during the specified class period may be eligible for compensation without incurring out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties can join by contacting Rosen Law Firm [3][6]. - To serve as a lead plaintiff, individuals must file a motion with the court by March 24, 2026 [3]. Group 2: Legal Representation - Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified legal counsel with a proven track record in securities class actions, highlighting their own success in this area [4]. - The firm has achieved significant settlements for investors, including over $438 million in 2019 alone, and has been recognized as a leader in securities class action settlements [4]. Group 3: Case Allegations - The lawsuit alleges that during the class period, Beyond Meat made materially false and misleading statements regarding the valuation of its long-lived assets, which could lead to a significant non-cash impairment charge [5]. - It is claimed that these misstatements impaired Beyond Meat's ability to file timely reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission, resulting in damages to investors when the truth was revealed [5].

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased F5, Inc. securities during the specified Class Period of the upcoming lead plaintiff deadline for a class action lawsuit, indicating potential compensation for affected investors [1][2]. Group 1: Class Action Details - The Class Period for the F5 securities is from October 28, 2024, to October 27, 2025, and the lead plaintiff deadline is set for February 17, 2026 [1]. - Investors can join the class action without incurring out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [1]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties must act by the specified deadline to serve as lead plaintiff [2]. Group 2: Law Firm Credentials - Rosen Law Firm specializes in securities class actions and has a strong track record, including the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company [3]. - The firm has been recognized for its success in securities class action settlements, ranking No. 1 in 2017 and consistently in the top 4 since 2013, recovering hundreds of millions for investors [3]. - In 2019, the firm secured over $438 million for investors, showcasing its capability in handling significant cases [3]. Group 3: Case Allegations - The lawsuit alleges that F5's management misrepresented the company's revenue outlook and growth potential while downplaying risks associated with seasonality and macroeconomic factors [4]. - It is claimed that F5's optimistic statements about its security capabilities were misleading, as the company was facing a significant security incident that jeopardized its future prospects [4]. - The lawsuit asserts that when the true situation was revealed, investors suffered damages due to the misleading information provided by F5 [4].

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding sellers of Endeavor Group Holdings, Inc. Class A common stock about a lead plaintiff deadline for a class action lawsuit related to alleged misleading statements and omissions during a specified class period [1][5]. Group 1: Class Action Details - The class period for the lawsuit is defined as between January 15, 2025, and March 24, 2025 [1]. - Investors who sold Endeavor Class A common stock during this period may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties must move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff by March 18, 2026 [3]. Group 2: Legal Representation - Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified legal counsel with a successful track record in securities class actions [4]. - The firm has achieved significant settlements in the past, including over $438 million for investors in 2019 and has been recognized as a leader in the field [4]. Group 3: Allegations Against Endeavor - The lawsuit seeks to recover damages for investors due to allegedly false and misleading statements in Endeavor's January 15, 2025 Information Statement and related SEC filings [5]. - Specific allegations include misleading information regarding the true value of Endeavor's shares and failure to disclose executive earnings and conflicts of interest related to a take-private merger [5].

We've constantly been sharing a list of our recent reads in our weekly emails for The Good Investors. Do subscribe for our weekly updates through the orange box in the blog (it's on the side if you're using a computer, and all the way at the bottom if you're using mobile) – it's free! But since our readership-audience for The Good Investors is wider than our subscriber base, we think sharing the reading list regularly on the blog itself can benefit even more people. The articles we share touch on a wide ran ...

Group 1: Intel's Current Situation - Intel's stock has seen significant gains, particularly after Nvidia's $5 billion investment and collaboration announcement, leading to over 100% increase since September [2] - Despite the excitement, Intel's stock is now trading at over 100 times forward earnings, making it relatively expensive compared to Nvidia, which trades at 24 times forward earnings [4] - Analysts project Intel's revenue growth to be modest, with only 2% growth expected for fiscal 2026 and nearly 8% for fiscal 2027, contrasting sharply with Nvidia's anticipated 52% growth for the same period [7] Group 2: Nvidia's Market Position - Nvidia's investment in Intel is seen as a strategic move, embedding Intel's CPUs into its computing units, which could enhance both companies' market positions [2] - Nvidia's dominance in the AI computing market is attributed to its graphics processing units (GPUs), which are more effective for AI workloads compared to CPUs [8] - The company is expected to benefit significantly from ongoing investments in data center infrastructure, with hyperscalers committing to substantial spending on computing capacity [12] Group 3: Market Sentiment and Future Outlook - The market remains optimistic about Intel's potential turnaround, although actual revenue growth has yet to materialize [9] - Concerns about a potential AI bubble exist, but Nvidia is not expected to be adversely affected as long as data center construction continues at a rapid pace [11] - The long-term outlook for generative AI technology remains uncertain, but Nvidia is well-positioned to capitalize on the necessary infrastructure buildout [12]

Core Insights - Chevron is the only major U.S. energy company operating in Venezuela, which has faced significant challenges due to sanctions and a declining energy sector [1] - The U.S. government's approach to Venezuela is likely to be economically driven, with control over oil sales and buyers [2] - Despite Venezuela's large oil reserves, its oil industry is weak and not as influential globally, leading to a modest impact on the energy sector overall [4] Company-Specific Insights - Chevron's current market capitalization is $364 billion, with a current stock price of $181.07 and a dividend yield of 3.78% [5][6] - The company has the potential to increase its production in Venezuela by up to 50% over the next two years, which is a key metric for investors to monitor [7] - While Chevron's operations in Venezuela are not the primary focus of its business, the company has an incentive to support the country's energy sector revival [6][8] Industry Context - The political developments in Venezuela are noteworthy but not the most critical aspect of Chevron's overall business strategy, as the company is diversified across various markets [8] - A recovery in Venezuela's energy sector alone may not be sufficient to counteract the volatility of global oil prices, indicating that investors should consider broader market conditions [9]