UN Policy Opposition - The US, led by Michael Waltz, Marco Rubio, and potentially Trump, successfully blocked a UN carbon tax, a move described as unprecedented in the shipping industry [1][2] - The opposition was unexpected, overcoming significant financial, NGO, diplomatic, and media influence [2] - The UN Secretary General was reportedly caught off guard by the US action [3] Potential Implications - The blocked carbon tax was allegedly intended to fund globalist NGOs by plugging holes in US Aid funding [3] - The European families with shipping investments and net wealth that far exceeds Elon's are suspected to be behind the UN carbon tax [1] - The American media (except @gCaptain and Fox News) was largely silent on the issue [2]

RT Secretary Marco Rubio (@SecRubio)This is another HUGE win for @POTUS.Thanks to his leadership, the United States prevented a massive UN tax hike on American consumers that would have funded progressive climate pet projects. Our country will continue to lead the way and put America FIRST. ...

Legislative Action & Regulatory Concerns - New York Legislature passed S4505, mirroring California's AB 56, mandating warning labels on social media platforms for all users [1] - The legislation compels companies to surveil users and deliver government-mandated messages [1] - X expresses deep concern that these measures erode free speech protections [2] - X believes the measures squander taxpayer resources on foreseeable legal challenges [2] First Amendment & Free Speech - The legislation is viewed as compelled speech in violation of the First Amendment [1] - X urges the Governor to veto the bill to protect free speech [2] - X aims to avoid repeating California's regulatory overreach [2]

Legal & Compliance - John Bolton faces federal indictment for allegedly storing thousands of pages of classified documents at his home after leaving government employment [1] - Bolton is accused of regularly sharing classified information with multiple uncleared individuals [1] - The method used for sharing classified information was via https://t.co/tszPGzqW2j, an AOL email account [1]

Legal & Political Commentary - The report highlights instances of alleged hypocrisy, where individuals who advocated for the prosecution of others for similar offenses are themselves facing indictments [1] - The report references John Bolton's stance on Julian Assange's prison sentence for disclosing classified information, contrasting it with Bolton's own indictment for leaking classified documents [1] Individuals Involved - Letitia James was indicted for housing fraud after indicting Trump for housing fraud [1] - John Bolton pushed for the prosecution of Julian Assange for leaking classified documents and was later indicted for leaking classified documents [1]

Allegations and Investigations - The document references an FBI investigation initiated by the Biden administration, potentially impacting the Iran Deal [1] - John Bolton is accused of trafficking top secret intel, while his email account was allegedly hacked by Iran [1] Political Implications - The situation involves figures like John Bolton and the Biden administration, suggesting potential political motivations or conflicts of interest related to the Iran Deal [1]

Read this whole post to take in the utter depth of depravity and corruption inside the British governmentLewis Brackpool (@Lewis_Brackpool):This is the most ABSURD FOI response I’ve had to date.The Home Office has refused to release records about which NGOs and charities are influencing asylum accommodation policy, because my social media activity supposedly poses a “safety risk” and could trigger “public https://t.co/Ut5Qyen6H1 ...

Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) & Transparency - The Home Office refused to release records about NGOs and charities influencing asylum accommodation policy, citing "safety risk" and potential "public backlash" due to the requestor's social media activity [1] - The Freedom of Information Act is applicant blind, ensuring authorities cannot selectively disclose information [2] - The Home Office is accused of shielding well-connected NGOs and contractors shaping policy on illegal migration and housing at taxpayers' expense from scrutiny [2] - An internal review has been filed demanding the decision be overturned, along with a follow-up FOI request for agendas and topics of secretive meetings [3] Concerns Regarding Transparency and Influence - The requestor's social media activity included sharing personal details and misleading narratives, causing safety concerns among stakeholders [2] - The government department is using the requestor's identity as a journalist to justify blocking a lawful transparency request [1]

RT Michael Shellenberger (@shellenberger)For the first time, the UK is seeking to censor a US web site with no physical presence in the UK. @Keir_Starmer has thus broken the promise he made to @realDonaldTrump in July. If Trump & Congress don't stand up to foreign censorship, the First Amendment will become worthless. https://t.co/3dLVLAnfky ...

RT Orbán Viktor (@PM_ViktorOrban)I just got off the phone with President @realDonaldTrump. Preparations for the USA-Russia peace summit are underway.Hungary is the island of PEACE! ...