Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Fermi Inc. by Berger Montague PC on behalf of investors who acquired Fermi securities during the Class Period from October 1, 2025, to December 11, 2025, including its IPO on October 1, 2025 [1][2] Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit alleges that Fermi misled investors about tenant demand for its Project Matador AI campus and the status of funding for that project [3] - It is claimed that the construction financing for Project Matador was reliant on a single tenant's funding commitment, which posed a significant risk of withdrawal [3] - Defendants' public statements are alleged to have lacked a reasonable basis due to these concealed risks [3] Group 2: Company Overview - Fermi Inc. is headquartered in Amarillo, Texas, and aims to establish a network of large, grid-independent data centers powered by nuclear, natural gas, solar, and battery energy [2] - The law firm Berger Montague has a strong track record in complex civil litigation, having recovered over $50 billion for clients over its 55-year history [5]

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Fermi Inc. and its executives due to significant stock price drop attributed to potential violations of federal securities laws [1][3]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit asserts securities fraud claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and Sections 11 and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 [3]. - Investors have until March 6, 2026, to request to lead the case in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York [3]. Group 2: Company Background - Fermi Inc. is an energy and AI infrastructure company aiming to build large-scale nuclear reactors to support grid-independent data centers for AI companies [4]. - The company's flagship project, Project Matador, is designed to provide dedicated power for AI workloads [4]. Group 3: IPO and Allegations - Fermi completed its IPO in October 2025, claiming strong demand for Project Matador and securing a 20-year lease with an investment-grade-rated tenant [5]. - Allegations suggest that Fermi overstated tenant demand and misrepresented the agreement with the First Tenant [6]. Group 4: Stock Price Impact - Following the announcement of the First Tenant's termination of the Advance in Aid of Construction Agreement, Fermi's stock dropped by $5.16, or over 33%, from $15.25 to $10.09 per share [7].

NEW YORK, Jan. 12, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Bernstein Liebhard LLP announces that a shareholder has filed a securities class action lawsuit on behalf of investors (the “Class”) who purchased or acquired Fermi Inc. (“Fermi” or the “Company”) (NASDAQ: FRMI): (a) common stock pursuant and/or traceable to the registration statement and prospectus (collectively, the “Registration Statement”) issued in connection with the Company’s October 2025 initial public offering (“IPO” or the “Offering”); and/or (b) securit ...

Core Viewpoint - The Fermi Inc. class action lawsuit alleges that the company and its executives made misleading statements regarding its Project Matador, leading to significant financial losses for investors following the termination of a key funding agreement [3][4][5]. Company Overview - Fermi Inc. is characterized as an energy and AI infrastructure company that conducted its initial public offering (IPO) in October 2025, selling 37,375,000 shares at a price of $21.00 per share [2]. Allegations of Misconduct - The lawsuit claims that Fermi overstated tenant demand for its Project Matador campus and failed to disclose reliance on a single tenant's funding commitment, which posed a risk of termination [3]. - It is alleged that the company did not adequately inform investors about the significant risk associated with the tenant's funding commitment [3]. Impact of the Lawsuit - Following the announcement that the first tenant for Project Matador had terminated a $150 million funding agreement, Fermi's stock price dropped nearly 34% [4]. - The stock price has reportedly fallen to as low as $8.59 per share, representing a 59% decline from the IPO price [5]. Legal Process - Investors who purchased Fermi common stock during the IPO or the specified class period can seek to be appointed as lead plaintiff in the class action lawsuit [6]. - The lead plaintiff will represent the interests of all class members and can choose a law firm to litigate the case [6]. Law Firm Background - Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP is a prominent law firm specializing in securities fraud and shareholder litigation, having secured over $2.5 billion for investors in 2024 alone [7].

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Fermi Inc. and its executives due to significant stock price drops linked to alleged violations of federal securities laws [1][3]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit claims securities fraud under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as well as claims under Sections 11 and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 [3]. - Investors have until March 6, 2026, to request to lead the case, which is pending in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York [3]. Group 2: Company Background - Fermi Inc. is an energy and AI infrastructure company aiming to build large-scale nuclear reactors to support grid-independent data centers for AI companies [4]. - The company's flagship project, Project Matador, is designed to provide dedicated power for AI workloads [4]. Group 3: IPO and Allegations - Fermi completed its IPO in October 2025, claiming strong demand for Project Matador and securing a 20-year lease with an investment-grade-rated tenant [5]. - Allegations suggest that Fermi overstated tenant demand and misrepresented the agreement with the First Tenant [6]. Group 4: Stock Price Impact - Following the termination of the Advance in Aid of Construction Agreement by the First Tenant on December 11, 2025, Fermi's stock dropped by $5.16 per share, over 33%, from $15.25 to $10.09 [7].

Group 1 - Fermi Inc. went public in early October with a valuation of $19 billion, which was considered excessive given its business plan rather than a fully established business [1] - The company's plan includes building a large data center in Texas and developing its own power generation capabilities, including a nuclear reactor [1][2] - The stock price has significantly declined from $32 at its IPO to under $10 [1] Group 2 - Fermi Inc. is focused on developing next-generation electric grids to support advanced artificial intelligence, integrating various energy sources such as nuclear, natural gas, solar, and battery storage [2] - There are other AI stocks in the market that are perceived to have greater upside potential and lower downside risk compared to Fermi Inc. [3]

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Fermi Inc. and its executives due to significant stock price drop attributed to potential violations of federal securities laws [1]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit includes securities fraud claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and Sections 11 and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 [3]. - Investors have until March 6, 2026, to request to lead the case, which is pending in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York [3]. Group 2: Company Background - Fermi Inc. is an energy and AI infrastructure company aiming to build large-scale nuclear reactors to support grid-independent data centers for AI companies [4]. - The company's flagship project, Project Matador, is designed to provide dedicated power for AI workloads [4]. Group 3: IPO and Allegations - Fermi completed its IPO in October 2025, claiming strong demand for Project Matador and securing a 20-year lease with an investment-grade-rated tenant [5]. - Allegations suggest that Fermi overstated tenant demand and misrepresented the agreement with the First Tenant [6]. Group 4: Stock Price Impact - On December 12, 2025, Fermi's stock dropped by $5.16 per share, over 33%, following the announcement that the First Tenant terminated the construction funding agreement [7].

LOS ANGELES--(BUSINESS WIRE)---- $FRMI--FRMI Investors Have Opportunity to Lead Fermi Inc. Securities Fraud Lawsuit with the Schall Law Firm. ...

NEW YORK, Jan. 09, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Levi & Korsinsky, LLP notifies investors in Fermi Inc. ("Fermi Inc." or the "Company") (NASDAQ: FRMI) of a class action securities lawsuit. CLASS DEFINITION: The lawsuit seeks to recover losses on behalf of Fermi Inc. investors who were adversely affected by alleged securities fraud. This lawsuit is on behalf of persons and entities that purchased or otherwise acquired Fermi: (a) common stock pursuant and/or traceable to the registration statement and prospectus i ...

Core Viewpoint - Fermi Inc. is facing a federal securities class action lawsuit due to allegations of misleading statements regarding its Project Matador campus and tenant commitments, which has led to significant investor losses following the termination of a key funding agreement [4][6][9]. Group 1: Company Overview - Fermi Inc. (NASDAQ: FRMI) completed its IPO on October 1, 2025, offering approximately 32.5 million shares at $21.00 per share, with plans to develop a large electric generation campus for AI data centers [7]. - The registration statement highlighted a "First Tenant" for the Project Matador site, with a letter of intent signed on September 19, 2025, for a long-term lease [7]. Group 2: Legal Allegations - The complaint alleges that Fermi and its executives violated federal securities laws by making false or misleading statements about tenant demand and the reliance on a single tenant's funding for Project Matador [6]. - Specific allegations include overstating tenant demand, failing to disclose risks related to the tenant's funding commitment, and misleading investors about the company's business prospects [6]. Group 3: Market Reaction - Following the announcement on December 12, 2025, that the First Tenant had terminated the Advance in Aid of Construction Agreement, Fermi's stock price dropped over 33%, closing at $10.09 per share, significantly below the IPO price [9].