Workflow
Galera(GRTX) - 2022 Q4 - Annual Report
GRTXGalera(GRTX)2023-03-08 12:31

Drug Development and Clinical Trials - Avasopasem has received Breakthrough Therapy Designation from the FDA for the reduction of severe oral mucositis (SOM) induced by radiotherapy, with a market opportunity exceeding 1.5billionintheU.S.alone[19]InthePhase3ROMANtrial,avasopasemdemonstratedastatisticallysignificantreductionintheincidenceofSOM,withamedianof8daysintheavasopasemarmcomparedto18daysintheplaceboarm[20]AfteroneyearoffollowupintheROMANtrial,theincidenceofchronickidneydisease(CKD)was101.5 billion in the U.S. alone[19] - In the Phase 3 ROMAN trial, avasopasem demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in the incidence of SOM, with a median of 8 days in the avasopasem arm compared to 18 days in the placebo arm[20] - After one year of follow-up in the ROMAN trial, the incidence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) was 10% in the avasopasem group versus 20% in the placebo group, indicating a potential renal protective effect[22] - The New Drug Application (NDA) for avasopasem was submitted in December 2022 and accepted for filing by the FDA in February 2023, with a PDUFA target date of August 9, 2023[23] - The company plans to meet with the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in 2023 to discuss the potential registration pathway for avasopasem in Europe[24] - Avasopasem was evaluated in a Phase 2a trial for reducing esophagitis in lung cancer patients, showing substantial reduction in severe esophagitis compared to historical data[25] - Rucosopasem, the second product candidate, is in clinical development to enhance the anti-cancer efficacy of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC)[27] - The GRECO-1 trial for rucosopasem in NSCLC has shown promising interim results, with target tumor reductions observed in five patients ranging from 27% to 61%[30] - The GRECO-2 trial for rucosopasem in LAPC is designed to assess overall survival, with enrollment expected to be completed in the second half of 2023[31] - The company has completed Phase 1 trials of rucosopasem and initiated Phase 1/2 and Phase 2b trials in patients with NSCLC and LAPC, respectively, expecting to complete enrollment in both trials in the second half of 2023[4] - The company aims to present clinical data to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) to support the use of avasopasem for reducing esophagitis and other radiotherapy-induced toxicities[35] - The GT-201 trial demonstrated a 92% reduction in the median duration of SOM in the 90 mg treatment arm compared to placebo (p=0.024)[87] - Avasopasem showed a 10% incidence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in patients treated with IMRT plus cisplatin, compared to 20% in the placebo arm (p=0.0043)[79] - The meta-analysis of the ROMAN and GT-201 trials (n=551) confirmed clinically meaningful improvements in SOM, including reductions in incidence, duration, and severity compared to placebo[100] - Avasopasem maintained anti-cancer efficacy of radiotherapy, with similar rates of tumor control and survival between avasopasem and placebo arms[65] - The incidence of Grade 4 oral mucositis was reduced by 27% in the avasopasem arm compared to placebo (p=0.052)[74] - Avasopasem was generally well tolerated, with no significant differences in the severity of adverse events compared to placebo[81] - Avasopasem demonstrated a 54.5% incidence of SOM with a median duration of 9 days in the EUSOM trial, consistent with a 54% incidence and 8 days median in the ROMAN trial[105] - In a trial with 46 patients, those receiving 6-7 weeks of avasopasem had a 29% incidence of SOM and a median duration of 2.5 days, with no Grade 4 OM cases reported[107] - One-year post-radiotherapy outcomes showed LRC, DMF, PFS, and OS rates of 93%, 93%, 84%, and 93% respectively, indicating that avasopasem does not compromise anti-cancer efficacy[108] - The AESOP trial enrolled 39 patients, with 35 completing treatment; 29 patients receiving at least five weeks of 90 mg avasopasem showed a substantial reduction in severe esophagitis incidence compared to historical data[112] - Rucosopasem is being developed to enhance the anti-cancer efficacy of SBRT, with preclinical studies indicating significant tumor reduction when combined with high daily doses of radiotherapy[119][126] - The Phase 1/2 pilot trial of avasopasem in LAPC patients evaluated three SBRT dose levels, ranging from 10 Gy/dose to 12 Gy/dose, focusing on maximum tolerated dose and overall response rate[129] - The GRECO-1 trial aims to enroll approximately 66 NSCLC patients, assessing the efficacy and safety of rucosopasem in combination with SBRT[134] - Interim results from the GRECO-1 trial showed in-field partial responses in 3 out of 7 patients and stable disease in another 3 patients[136] - The GRECO-2 trial expects to enroll approximately 160 patients to determine the impact on overall survival of adding rucosopasem to SBRT[138] Market Opportunity and Commercialization - The company plans to build a specialized sales and marketing organization in the U.S. with approximately 40 sales representatives targeting around 5,000 radiation oncologists for the commercialization of avasopasem and rucosopasem, if approved[4] - The company estimates that approximately 70% of head and neck cancer (HNC) patients treated with radiotherapy will develop severe oral mucositis (SOM), representing a target patient population of approximately 43,500 in the U.S.[56] - The total market opportunity for treating SOM in HNC patients in the U.S. is estimated to exceed 1.5 billion[62] - Market research indicates that 48% to 69% of oncologists would use avasopasem for eligible patients, with many planning to adopt it within the first 12 months of availability[64] - Current treatments for radiotherapy-induced esophagitis are largely symptomatic, with no FDA-approved drugs available, highlighting a significant market opportunity for avasopasem[110] - Avasopasem's mechanism targets the root cause of radiotherapy-induced esophagitis, potentially establishing it as the standard of care for lung cancer patients[111] - The company plans to commercialize avasopasem by building a specialized sales and marketing organization focused on radiation and medical oncologists[146] Intellectual Property and Regulatory Considerations - As of December 31, 2022, the company had approximately 18 issued U.S. patents and 112 issued foreign patents[159] - Avasopasem is covered by a composition of matter patent in the U.S. with a natural expiration date in March 2022, and potential extensions could extend to 2031[161] - Avasopasem is projected to expire between 2032 and 2035, while rucosopasem may have an expiration date in 2038 if patent term extensions are granted[162][164] - The company has a trademark portfolio consisting of 3 registered U.S. trademarks, 9 pending U.S. trademark applications, 26 registered foreign trademarks, and 9 pending foreign trademark applications as of December 31, 2022[165] - The FDA's review process for new drug applications (NDAs) typically takes about 10 months from the date of filing for a new molecular entity, but can be longer depending on various factors[185] - The FDA may refer an NDA application for a novel drug to an advisory committee for independent expert review and recommendations[186] - The company must submit progress reports detailing clinical trial results to the FDA at least annually, with more frequent submissions if serious adverse events occur[182] - The company has pending patent applications that may provide protection for the use of its product candidates in connection with oncology products, projected to expire between 2037 and 2041[164] - The company relies on trade secrets and technological innovation to maintain its competitive position, protected through confidentiality and invention assignment agreements[166] - The FDA may impose post-approval requirements, including Phase 4 clinical trials, to monitor a product's safety and effectiveness after commercialization[196] - The FDA offers expedited programs such as fast track designation, which allows for more frequent interactions with the FDA review team during product development[190] - Priority review designation can reduce the FDA review goal to six months for drugs that offer major advances in treatment[191] - Products providing meaningful advantages over existing treatments may be eligible for accelerated approval based on surrogate endpoints[192] - The FDA may withdraw approval if compliance with regulatory requirements is not maintained, leading to potential product recalls or marketing restrictions[198] - Non-patent exclusivity for new chemical entities (NCEs) lasts five years, preventing ANDA submissions for generic versions during this period[209] - The Hatch-Waxman Act provides three years of data exclusivity for new clinical investigations deemed essential for approval[210] Financial and Market Dynamics - The Royalty Agreement with Blackstone Life Sciences allows for up to 117.5millioninpayments,withthefourthtrancheincreasedto117.5 million in payments, with the fourth tranche increased to 37.5 million and an additional 20milliontrancheforaclinicalenrollmentmilestone[168][170]Thecompanyreceived20 million tranche for a clinical enrollment milestone[168][170] - The company received 20 million in June 2021 for the enrollment of the first patient in the GRECO-2 trial and $37.5 million in July 2021 for completing enrollment in the ROMAN trial[170] - The Royalty Agreement stipulates that the company will pay Blackstone a high single-digit percentage of worldwide net sales of the products during the Royalty Period[171] - Pharmaceutical product sales are influenced by third-party payor coverage and reimbursement levels, which are determined on a plan-by-plan basis[213] - Third-party payors are increasingly reducing reimbursements for pharmaceutical products, impacting physician usage and patient demand[214] - The U.S. government and state legislatures are implementing cost-containment programs, including price controls and restrictions on coverage, which could limit product sales[214] - International reimbursement and healthcare payment systems vary significantly, with many countries instituting price ceilings on specific products[215] - The European Union allows member states to restrict reimbursement for medicinal products and control their prices, affecting market dynamics[215] - There is no assurance that a product will be deemed medically necessary or cost-effective by third-party payors, impacting profitability[216] - Products may face competition from lower-priced alternatives in countries with price controls and from imported foreign products[215] - Obtaining adequate reimbursement for drugs administered under physician supervision is particularly challenging due to higher associated prices[214] - Decisions regarding coverage and reimbursement for off-label uses are limited and vary by third-party payor[213] - The variability in reimbursement policies across countries can significantly affect the market potential for pharmaceutical products[215]