CENTURY HUATONG(002602)2024-04-29 17:54Topic 1: Commitments to Avoid Competition and Regulate Related Transactions - The company has made commitments to avoid同业竞争 and规范关联交易, ensuring no损害世纪华通及其他股东的合法权益[157][160] - Commitments include not engaging in any business activities that compete with Century Huatong's existing game business, Dian Dian Beijing, and Dian Dian Cayman[157][160] - If any potential同业竞争 arises, the company will notify Century Huatong and transfer the business opportunity to them[158][161] - The company will prioritize the interests of Century Huatong, Dian Dian Beijing, or Dian Dian Cayman in case of利益冲突[158][161] - The company will减持 or转让 any competitive assets and businesses to avoid同业竞争[158][161] - The company will strictly comply with relevant laws, regulations, and规范性文件 to规范关联交易[159][162] - The company will履行关联交易决策、回避表决等公允决策程序 in shareholder meetings[159][162] - The company will minimize关联交易 with Century Huatong and ensure any unavoidable关联交易 follows公平、公开的原则[160][162] - The company will承担赔偿责任 if any承诺 are violated, causing losses to Century Huatong or its subsidiaries[157][160] Topic 2: Legal Disputes and Court Rulings Related to Game Copyrights - CQ withdrew the lawsuit regarding the infringement of "Legend" game software copyright, and the case was closed[187] - The second trial of the lawsuit involving "Legend" game software copyright was revoked, and the case was sent back for retrial[187] - The lawsuit filed by Actoz against CQ and others for copyright infringement was dismissed in the first trial[188] - The lawsuit filed by Actoz against Wemade and others for copyright infringement was dismissed in the first trial[188] - The second trial of the lawsuit filed by Actoz against Wemade resulted in a payment of 3,952,886,537 KRW plus interest[189] - The lawsuit filed by Actoz against CQ for copyright infringement was dismissed in the second trial[190] - The lawsuit filed by Actoz and Zhenchuanqi against Wemade and others was withdrawn and the case was closed[190] - The court ruled in favor of Shengqu Information, Shulong Technology, and Chengdu Youji, ordering Wemade Co., Ltd. and its subsidiaries to compensate for economic losses of 4.6 million RMB and reasonable litigation expenses of 400,000 RMB[193] - The court froze bank deposits of Wemade subsidiaries in China, totaling 100 million RMB, as part of property preservation measures[192] - A lawsuit involving the "Legend" game series resulted in a court order for Wemade and its subsidiaries to pay CQ 11.66 billion KRW, with additional interest at 5% and 12% rates[194] - The court dismissed claims to invalidate contracts related to the "Legend" game series, but ordered defendants to pay CQ 817.11 million KRW with interest[194] - Wemade and its subsidiaries were required to publish a statement in the "China Intellectual Property News" to eliminate the impact of their commercial defamation[192] - The company's subsidiary, Blue Sand Information and Shengqu Games Limited, were ordered to jointly pay 634,449.56[196] - Actoz's joint liability amount was corrected from RMB 450,824,162 to RMB 486,379,540 in the final award[197] - The court dismissed the appeal of Actoz, and Blue Sand Information and Shengqu Games Limited withdrew their appeal applications[197] - The company's subsidiary, Shulong Technology, was involved in a lawsuit regarding the development of "Legend World Mobile" based on "Legend World," which was dismissed by the court[197] - The company's subsidiary, Shengqu Information, was involved in a lawsuit regarding the copyright of "Legend World" software, which was concluded with a second-instance judgment[197] - The company's subsidiary, Shengqu Information, licensed the copyright of "Legend World" to 37 Interactive Entertainment's affiliates for the development of "Legendary Overlord," which was subsequently entrusted to Beijing Qike for operation[198] - The court ruled that 37 Interactive Entertainment and Beijing Qike must cease operating the game "Legendary Overlord" due to copyright infringement of "The Legend of Mir 2"[199] - The court ordered 37 Interactive Entertainment and Shanghai Yingtong Network Technology to compensate the plaintiff with a total of 100,000 yuan for reasonable expenses related to the "Legendary Overlord Mobile" case[200] - The court ruled that 37 Interactive Entertainment must cease operating the game "Golden Legend" due to copyright infringement of "The Legend of Mir 2"[200] - The Supreme People's Court has transferred the second trial of the "Golden Legend" case to the Beijing High People's Court for further review[200]