姓名权边界岂容随意突破

Core Viewpoint - The incident of a young man in Hunan changing his name three times within a year highlights the tension between individual rights and public interest, emphasizing the need for clearer legal standards regarding name changes [1][2][3] Group 1: Individual Rights and Public Interest - The young man's name changes reflect a broader trend among the "post-00s" generation seeking unique identities, but such expressions must not violate public order and morals [2] - The rejection of the name "周天紫微大帝" was primarily due to its potential to mislead and challenge social ethics, indicating a need for balance between personal freedom and societal norms [1][2] - Frequent name changes can lead to practical issues for individuals, such as job application complications and social ridicule, as well as consuming public resources in processing these requests [1] Group 2: Legal and Institutional Framework - There is a lack of clear guidelines in judicial practice regarding what constitutes a violation of public order and morals, leading to inconsistent rulings across different regions [2][3] - Legislative bodies are urged to establish concrete standards for the use of names, particularly concerning special titles from religion, mythology, and history [3] - The need for educational and cultural initiatives is emphasized to help young people understand the value of cultural symbols while pursuing individuality [3]