Workflow
多家公司,“披星戴帽”
Zheng Quan Shi Bao·2025-04-29 10:10

Core Viewpoint - The implementation of the new "National Nine Articles" and accompanying delisting regulations has tightened financial delisting indicators, creating significant pressure for underperforming companies in the A-share market [1][5]. Group 1: Delisting Risk Warnings - As of April 28, 2024, a total of 41 companies will be subject to risk warnings due to financial non-compliance and internal control deficiencies, with their stock being suspended for one day on April 29 and renamed starting April 30 [2][3]. - Since the beginning of the year, 99 companies have been subjected to risk warnings, with 74 facing delisting risk due to market capitalization and 25 receiving other risk warnings [2]. - Companies like Guohua Network Security reported negative profits and revenues below 300 million yuan, triggering delisting risk warnings under the Shenzhen Stock Exchange rules [2][3]. Group 2: New Delisting Regulations - The new delisting regulations, effective from 2024, include stricter financial, trading, compliance, and major violation indicators for delisting risk warnings [5][6]. - The revenue threshold for main board companies has been raised from 10 million yuan to 30 million yuan, increasing the elimination of underperforming companies [6]. - The market capitalization delisting threshold for main board A-shares has been increased from 300 million yuan to 500 million yuan, while thresholds for the Sci-Tech Innovation Board and Growth Enterprise Market remain unchanged at 300 million yuan [6]. Group 3: Market Impact and Investor Protection - The new delisting regulations aim to enhance the overall quality of listed companies by increasing delisting standards and reducing the value of "shell" resources, effectively driving out underperforming entities [7]. - The regulations also emphasize deterrence against financial fraud and governance issues, making it more challenging to engage in shell trading [7]. - The implementation of these regulations is expected to accelerate the market's cleansing process, with a higher likelihood of companies being forcibly delisted due to financial misconduct [7].