提供AI账号招人直播构成劳动关系吗？法院判了

Core Viewpoint - The case highlights the emergence of "incomplete labor relationships" in the context of AI digital human live streaming, where companies exert control over workers while not fully establishing traditional labor relations [1][2][3] Group 1: Company Practices - A network company recruited personnel for AI digital human live streaming, providing a one-year free digital account and requiring a minimum of 4 hours of daily streaming [1] - The company imposed a 6% revenue sharing model and required weekly submission of streaming data, indicating substantial control over the worker's activities [2] - Despite the control, the worker retained some autonomy in choosing the streaming platform and content, reflecting a blend of management and flexibility in new employment models [2][3] Group 2: Legal Findings - The court determined that the network company had a degree of controlling labor management over the worker, but the relationship did not meet the criteria for a full labor relationship [2] - The company failed to provide necessary training and support despite the worker's repeated requests for assistance, which contributed to the worker's inability to fulfill contractual obligations [2] - The court ruled that the company's claim for a breach of contract penalty lacked factual and legal basis, leading to the dismissal of the company's lawsuit [2]