Dynavax Highlights Superior Board Leadership Overseeing Long-Term Value Creation Strategy

Core Viewpoint - Dynavax Technologies Corporation is urging stockholders to vote "FOR" its four director nominees in the upcoming Annual Meeting, emphasizing the importance of maintaining a qualified board to support the company's strategic direction and long-term value creation [1][2][9] Group 1: Board Composition and Qualifications - The Dynavax Board has been significantly refreshed, with six of the eight independent directors appointed since 2020, enhancing corporate governance and operational performance [3][4] - The current board members possess extensive industry knowledge and experience, with 9 out of 9 having operational and commercial experience, and 7 out of 9 having vaccine experience [4] - The four nominees—Brent MacGregor, Scott Myers, Lauren Silvernail, and Elaine Sun—bring a wealth of expertise across various facets of biotechnology and vaccine development, crucial for guiding the company [6] Group 2: Financial Performance and Strategy - Dynavax has achieved total stockholder returns of 267% over the past five years, significantly outperforming the NASDAQ Biotechnology Index and the S&P Biotechnology Select Industry Index [4] - The commercialization of HEPLISAV-B® has been highly successful, generating a record $268 million in net product revenue in 2024, with expectations of$305-$325 million in 2025 [4] - The company is advancing a differentiated pipeline, including a shingles vaccine targeting a$4.4 billion market and a plague vaccine with a Phase 2 trial expected to start in Q3 2025 [4] Group 3: Capital Strategy - Dynavax is executing a $200 million share repurchase program, with$128.8 million already completed as of Q1 2025, demonstrating a commitment to returning capital to stockholders [5] - The company has refinanced a majority of its outstanding Convertible Senior Notes, strengthening its capital structure and reducing the overall cost of capital [5] Group 4: Opposition to Deep Track Capital - Deep Track Capital is seeking to replace four independent directors, which Dynavax argues would be detrimental to the company's long-term value and momentum [2][7] - The board asserts that Deep Track's proposals lack actionable ideas for growing HEPLISAV-B® and prioritize short-term interests over sustainable growth [8][9] - The qualifications of Dynavax's nominees are highlighted as superior to those of Deep Track's candidates, who have limited public company board experience [6][7]