专家称“4+4”初衷是培养医学领袖：有严格考试，不是“特权”工具

Core Viewpoint - The "4+4" medical training model in China, originally designed to cultivate academic leaders through rigorous examination, has come under scrutiny due to recent controversies regarding the qualifications of graduates from this program [1][2][4]. Group 1: Background of the "4+4" Model - The "4+4" model aims to train interdisciplinary medical professionals and is inspired by the American medical education system, which allows for career transitions into medicine [4]. - The model is most notably implemented at Peking Union Medical College and Shanghai Jiao Tong University, providing a pathway for students from various academic backgrounds to enter the medical field [4]. Group 2: Public Concerns and Misunderstandings - Public discourse has equated "4+4" trainees with "special training" students, raising concerns about fairness in hospital recruitment practices [2]. - Critics argue that the shortened training period may lead to inadequately prepared doctors, questioning the competency of those who transition from non-medical fields [4][5]. Group 3: Expert Opinions - Experts assert that all medical graduates, regardless of their training model, must undergo standardized residency training and pass licensing exams before practicing medicine [4]. - A notable expert emphasized that the "4+4" model's intention is to foster academic leaders, and it should not devolve into a tool for privilege [2][4]. Group 4: Comparison with U.S. Medical Training - The U.S. medical education system is characterized by strict standards, requiring extensive training and examinations before one can practice medicine, contrasting with the concerns raised about the "4+4" model [4][5]. - An example of a successful transition into medicine from a non-medical background is provided by a medical student who shifted from a finance career to medical school in the U.S., highlighting the rigorous training he underwent [5].