事关外卖小哥交通事故等问题，最高法发布典型案例

Group 1 - The Supreme People's Court released four typical cases focusing on the rights protection of new employment form workers, emphasizing the need to safeguard the interests of workers, victims, and enterprises, and promote the healthy development of platform economy [1] - The court ruled that an insurance company should compensate a delivery company for an accident that occurred while a delivery worker was engaged in work-related activities, encouraging companies to purchase commercial insurance for new employment form workers [1] - A case supported a delivery worker's claim for compensation from a property management company after being injured by a closing electric door, reinforcing the principle that third-party liability is not exempted by the worker's receipt of occupational injury benefits [1] Group 2 - A case clarified that a victim can include an insurance company as a co-defendant in a lawsuit against a delivery worker and logistics company, allowing direct claims against the insurance company for compensation [2] - The court recognized the existence of an employment relationship between a transportation company and a ride-hailing driver, ensuring that the driver enjoys labor rights [2]