苏州劳动争议“十大案例”发布

Core Viewpoint - The Suzhou Intermediate Court and Suzhou Human Resources and Social Security Bureau released the top ten typical labor dispute cases for 2024, aiming to promote a harmonious labor relationship between employers and employees, reflecting common issues in current labor relations [1] Group 1: Wage and Employment Rights - In the "Wages Paid in Coupons" case, the court ruled that employers must pay wages in monetary form, rejecting a supply chain company's practice of using vouchers instead of cash for labor compensation, thus protecting workers' rights to receive wages [2] - In the "Delayed Wage Payment" case, an individual was held criminally liable for malicious wage arrears, demonstrating the legal system's strict stance against such behavior to safeguard workers' property rights [2] - The court did not support a new materials company's attempt to offset annual leave with team-building activities, emphasizing the need for employers to respect employees' autonomy regarding their vacation time and methods [2] Group 2: Employment Discrimination and Rights Protection - In the case of employment discrimination, a physically disabled worker's right to equal employment was upheld, with the court ruling that a manufacturing company's termination of the labor contract was unlawful [3] - The court recognized the rights of a hearing-impaired delivery worker regarding occupational injury and provided him with options for relief, reflecting the protection of rights for workers in new employment forms [2] - An elderly worker received support for compensation discrepancies due to the employer's failure to timely report an occupational injury, clarifying that elderly workers should enjoy equal occupational injury insurance benefits during their coverage period [2] Group 3: Confidentiality and Non-Compete Agreements - In the area of commercial secret protection, an individual was deemed to have committed a serious violation by photographing and storing company secrets, leading to the lawful termination of their labor contract [3] - In a dispute involving non-compete obligations, the court legally defined the scope of non-compete duties and competitive relationships, ensuring the orderly flow of high-tech talent [3] - An individual faced fines for refusing to comply with a court's preservation order, highlighting the legal protection of high-tech companies' legitimate rights [3]