强化服务保障 推动民企健康发展

Core Points - The Private Economy Promotion Law will take effect on May 20, 2025, with Chapter Six focusing on service guarantees, aiming to create a stable business environment through legal constraints on administrative enforcement, optimizing government services, and enhancing communication between government and enterprises [1][2][3] Group 1: Administrative Enforcement - The law addresses long-standing issues of arbitrary enforcement, establishing prohibitive clauses against excessive inspections and fines, ensuring that administrative penalties for private enterprises are consistent with those for other economic organizations [1][2] - Article 50 mandates that administrative actions should minimize disruption to the normal operations of private enterprises, while Article 52 encourages the consolidation of similar inspections to reduce the burden on businesses [2] Group 2: Optimizing Government Services - The law elevates the principle of "streamlining administration and delegating power" to a legal obligation, pushing the government towards a model of "no disturbance without cause, and prompt response when needed" [2] - Articles 46 to 49 outline various services that the government must provide, including publicizing preferential policies, formulating entrepreneurship incentives, and reducing market entry and exit costs [2] Group 3: Enhancing Government-Enterprise Communication - The law establishes a formal communication mechanism between government officials and private enterprise operators, ensuring compliance and integrity in interactions [3] - Article 55 introduces a complaint and dispute resolution mechanism for administrative enforcement violations, upgrading previous policies to legal status and ensuring effective communication channels [3] Group 4: Legal Implementation and Impact - The transition from policy to law reflects a commitment to equal protection of various ownership economies, addressing inconsistencies in execution across regions and departments [3] - The law aims to enhance institutional rigidity and improve execution efficiency through legal accountability, although successful implementation will require innovative service methods and case-based penalties [3]