展现知识产权司法保护成效，最高检发布典型案例

Core Insights - The Supreme People's Procuratorate has released nine typical cases of intellectual property protection, showcasing the effectiveness of the procuratorial work in this area [1][2] - The cases cover a wide range of fields, including advanced manufacturing, software algorithms, cultural sectors like online literature and intangible cultural heritage, as well as traditional Chinese medicine [1] Group 1: Case Highlights - In the case of "Ningbo Sheng Certain Cultural Media Co., Ltd. copyright infringement dispute series of false litigation supervision," the procuratorial authority strengthened supervision over false litigation, integrating criminal and civil prosecution functions, leading to the correction of erroneous civil judgments and the transfer of criminal clues, resulting in the defendant receiving a criminal sentence [1] - The case involving "Beijing Jun Certain Technology Co., Ltd. and others for commercial secret infringement" saw the procuratorial authority simultaneously review criminal offenses and civil infringement facts, discovering omitted criminal clues related to business information infringement from prior civil judgments, and pursuing prosecution based on comprehensive evidence [1] - The "Zhang Certain and Sun Certain copyright infringement case" represents a new type of digital copyright case, involving numerous works and significant amounts, where the procuratorial authority accurately identified the use of "hotlinking" to disseminate works, infringing on the rights of information network dissemination, and pursued criminal liability for copyright infringement [1] Group 2: New Approaches and Goals - The procuratorial authority continues to explore new pathways for handling online infringement cases, as seen in the "Wu Certain and Shi Certain selling counterfeit registered trademark goods case," which involved online sales of counterfeit traditional Chinese medicine products, emphasizing the collection and examination of electronic evidence and accurately determining charges based on subjective intent and harm [2] - The release of these typical cases aims to provide a more comprehensive and direct demonstration of intellectual property prosecution work, guiding the professional and standardized handling of such cases, and enhancing societal awareness of intellectual property protection [2]