对“旱涝保收”说不！证监会：建立与基金业绩表现挂钩的浮动管理费收取机制

Core Viewpoint - The China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) has released an action plan to promote the high-quality development of public funds, introducing a new floating management fee mechanism linked to fund performance [1][2]. Group 1: Floating Management Fee Mechanism - The new fee structure stipulates that if a fund's performance meets the benchmark, it will charge the standard fee rate; if performance is significantly below the benchmark, a lower fee rate will apply; and if performance exceeds the benchmark, a higher fee rate will be charged [1][2]. - The floating fee mechanism aims to reduce the "guaranteed income" phenomenon for fund companies, encouraging them to enhance investment capabilities [2][5]. - The CSRC plans to implement this mechanism for newly established actively managed equity funds, with a target that at least 60% of the funds issued by leading firms in the next year will adopt this model [2][5]. Group 2: Historical Context and Current Trends - Since the exploration of floating fee structures began in 2013, the industry has seen continuous innovation, with 249 floating management fee funds reported as of May 7, 2025 [2][3]. - The main types of fee structures include scale-linked fees, holding period-linked fees, and performance-linked fees, with the latter being the most prevalent, accounting for nearly 90% of the market [3][4]. - Historical guidelines from 2017 outlined two main floating fee models: one that adjusts fees based on performance relative to a benchmark and another that charges performance fees based on excess returns [3][4]. Group 3: Future Outlook - The implementation of the new action plan is expected to further popularize the performance-based fee model, leading to a shift from "scale-driven" to "ability-driven" growth in the public fund industry [5]. - The focus on performance will enhance the core competitiveness of fund companies and promote a more competitive industry landscape [5]. - Despite the new fee structures, it is emphasized that investors should consider multiple factors, including the management company's strength and the fund manager's investment capabilities, when making investment decisions [5].