青岛集中曝光：美克家居、杜蕾斯等13家单位有重大火灾隐患

Core Viewpoint - The Qingdao Fire Rescue Department has conducted fire safety inspections across the city, exposing 13 companies for significant fire hazards, highlighting the need for compliance with fire safety regulations [1][2]. Group 1: Companies Exposed - Meike International Home Furnishings Co., Ltd. Qingdao Branch and Qingdao Baodi Property Management Co., Ltd. were found to have obstructed evacuation routes, violating Article 28 of the Fire Protection Law of the People's Republic of China [2]. - Qingdao Boxin Aluminum Industry Co., Ltd. and Boxin Hotel (formerly Jinjiang Inn Cangkou Park) failed to meet smoke exhaust facility requirements, violating Article 16 of the Fire Protection Law [2]. - The Earl's Lady Beauty Salon in Laoshan District had damaged evacuation signs and inadequate fire safety equipment, violating Article 16 of the Fire Protection Law [2]. - Qingdao Tianyi Renhe Property Service Co., Ltd. had unqualified personnel in the fire control room, violating Article 26 of the Fire Safety Management Regulations for High-Rise Civil Buildings [2]. - Qingdao London Durex Co., Ltd. had untrained staff operating the fire alarm control panel, violating Article 16 of the Fire Protection Law [2]. - Qingdao Jinhai Dongrun Commercial Management Co., Ltd. had barriers obstructing escape routes, violating Article 28 of the Fire Protection Law [2]. - Qingdao Zhongxiang International Logistics Co., Ltd. had insufficient spacing between items and walls in a fire zone, violating Article 6.8 of the Fire Safety Management Regulations for Warehousing [2]. - Huangdao District Mingxi Foot Massage and Health Center had a malfunctioning smoke exhaust control cabinet, violating Article 16 of the Fire Protection Law [2]. - Qingdao Guangchunyu Furniture Co., Ltd. had inadequate pressure in indoor fire hydrants, violating Article 7.4.12 of the Fire Water Supply and Fire Hydrant System Technical Specifications [2]. - Pingdu City Junyang Longcheng Steel Processing Department obstructed fire escape routes with goods, violating Article 28 of the Fire Protection Law [2]. - Laixi City Tianyu Hotel operated without the required fire safety inspection approval, violating Article 15 of the Fire Protection Law [2]. - Jimo District Laoyujia Grand Hotel lacked smoke exhaust facilities in a banquet hall, violating Article 8.2.2(7) of the Building Fire Prevention General Code [2].