基金经理薪酬、公募管理费和业绩挂钩，基民获得感能提升吗？

Group 1 - The "Action Plan" aims to achieve a turning point for high-quality development in the public fund industry within approximately three years, introducing 25 policy measures to regulate the industry [1] - The plan emphasizes a virtuous cycle of "increased returns - influx of funds - market stability," reflecting a commitment to mutual development between fund managers and investors [1] - The introduction of clear performance benchmarks for funds is expected to enhance investor confidence and stabilize investment styles in the long term [2][4] Group 2 - The management fee structure will shift from a focus on scale to a focus on returns, with floating management fees linked to performance benchmarks for newly established actively managed equity funds [2][3] - The plan mandates that the management fee for these funds will be determined based on their performance relative to a set benchmark, with specific fee rates applicable depending on performance outcomes [2][3] Group 3 - Fund manager compensation will be closely tied to fund performance, with a requirement that performance metrics account for at least 80% of their evaluation [4][6] - The plan aims to reduce costs for investors by lowering management fees and sales service fees, particularly for index and money market funds [4][5] Group 4 - The overall salary levels in the public fund industry are expected to decline, with a reported 17% decrease in average salary from 2023 to 2024 for a leading fund management company [5] - Concerns have been raised about the potential increase in the trend of high-performing fund managers leaving for private equity, which may complicate investment choices for average investors [5] Group 5 - The "Action Plan" includes measures to enhance investor services, such as optimizing investment research and risk management resources, and establishing a direct sales platform for institutional investors [6][7] - The plan also addresses issues like "style drift" and aims to ensure that each fund has a clear performance benchmark to prevent misalignment between fund behavior and investor expectations [7] Group 6 - The public fund industry is currently facing challenges such as shrinking scales and declining revenues, with some companies reporting significant drops in net profits due to the fee reform [8][9] - The regulatory stance supports innovation and development among leading fund companies while promoting the growth of smaller firms through differentiated strategies [9]