AI工具使用怪象频出，有人为检测一篇论文掏空钱包！如此“人工智能”太功利

Group 1 - The core issue revolves around the increasing use of AI tools in education, leading to concerns about academic integrity and the effectiveness of AI detection systems [1][2][3] - Reports indicate that classic literary works have high AI-generated content similarity rates, with examples showing 62.88% for "Lotus Pond Moonlight" and 52.88% for "The Wandering Earth" [1] - Educational institutions are responding by implementing regulations on AI usage in assignments, with some universities prohibiting direct use of AI-generated content in theses [2][3] Group 2 - The phenomenon of "using AI to detect AI" raises questions about the accuracy of current detection methods and their ability to distinguish between original and AI-generated content [2][3] - There are emerging tools designed to reduce AI detection rates in written work, indicating a cycle of AI usage and countermeasures in academic settings [3] - The over-reliance on AI tools in education may undermine students' critical thinking and creativity, prompting a need for a balanced approach to AI integration [4] Group 3 - The integration of AI in education is seen as an unstoppable trend, with a focus on fostering AI literacy and talent among students [4][5] - Educational reforms are underway, with initiatives like the Nanjing AI Education Action Plan aiming for 100% AI course coverage in primary and secondary schools by 2027 [5] - There is a call for a comprehensive and scientific approach to AI education, emphasizing the importance of developing a healthy understanding of human-AI collaboration [5]