法官表述不当？普法也要讲章法

Core Viewpoint - The recent controversy surrounding the "collision case" in Qingdao highlights the importance of accurate legal education and the potential consequences of misinformation in public legal programs [1][2]. Group 1: Incident Details - The incident involved two women, one aged 59 and the other 29, where the former, while on a phone call, turned and collided with the latter, resulting in injury [1]. - Initial reports incorrectly stated that the plaintiff was at fault for not maintaining a "safe distance," which led to public confusion and criticism of the court's decision [1]. Group 2: Legal Education and Responsibility - The court emphasized the necessity for accurate representation of facts in legal education programs, as errors can undermine the authority of the law and the credibility of local courts [2]. - The court's response included a commitment to higher standards in legal education, indicating a need for accountability and thoroughness in the presentation of legal cases [2].