阿维塔回应博主道歉视频：直播测试车辆为量产车，将索赔1000万元 涉事博主称“会认真对待”

Core Viewpoint - The controversy surrounding Avita 12's wind resistance coefficient has escalated, leading to legal action by Avita Technology against a social media influencer for alleged misrepresentation of the vehicle's testing conditions [1][2]. Group 1: Legal Actions and Responses - Avita Technology's legal department has filed a civil lawsuit against the influencer, demanding the cessation of infringement and compensation of 10 million RMB for economic and reputational damages [1]. - The influencer issued an apology but continued to imply that the vehicle tested was a prototype rather than a production model, raising further questions about the vehicle's classification [2][5]. Group 2: Vehicle Classification and Testing - Avita Technology asserts that the vehicle used in the wind tunnel test was a production model, which is designed for mass production and must meet stricter durability and safety standards compared to prototype vehicles [2][3]. - The distinction between prototype and production vehicles is critical, as prototypes are often used for testing extreme design features and do not need to comply with all regulations [3]. Group 3: Wind Resistance Testing and Industry Standards - The wind tunnel test conducted by Avita Technology showed a wind resistance coefficient of 0.2169Cd to 0.2173Cd at a speed of 160 KPH, closely aligning with the previously advertised coefficient of 0.21Cd [5]. - The automotive industry is witnessing a shift in focus towards wind resistance coefficients, with many electric vehicles achieving coefficients between 0.2Cd and 0.3Cd, which is crucial for enhancing product competitiveness [6][7]. - There is currently no national or industry standard for wind resistance testing, leading to significant discrepancies in results from different testing institutions [7].