中证协修订发布《中国证券业协会证券纠纷调解规则》 纠纷调解规则共分为六章

Core Viewpoint - The China Securities Association has revised the "Securities Dispute Mediation Rules" to enhance the multi-faceted resolution mechanism for securities disputes, ensuring better protection of investors' rights and interests, and aligning with national financial regulatory guidelines [1][2]. Summary by Sections Section 1: Regulatory Framework - The revised mediation rules are based on the "Securities Law of the People's Republic of China" and the "Opinions on Promoting High-Quality Development of Financial Dispute Mediation" issued by financial regulatory authorities [1]. Section 2: Implementation of Mandatory Mediation - The rules clarify the circumstances under which mandatory mediation applies, excluding disputes already resolved through other means or those with existing effective mediation agreements [2]. Section 3: Enhancing Credibility and Mechanisms - The rules emphasize fair and impartial mediation, establishing a self-discipline mechanism for serious breaches of mediation agreements, thereby enhancing the credibility of the mediation process [3]. Section 4: Streamlining Mediation Processes - The mediation process has been optimized to include simplified and standard procedures based on the complexity of disputes, with various mediation methods such as in-person, online, and telephone mediation [4]. Section 5: Cooperation Mechanisms - The association has improved communication and collaboration with courts and arbitration institutions to enhance the effectiveness of mediation agreements and ensure their enforcement [4][5]. Section 6: Introduction of Small Claims Mediation - A new small claims mediation mechanism allows industry institutions to voluntarily agree to mediation proposals for disputes within a certain monetary range, facilitating quicker resolutions [5]. Section 7: Mechanism for Collective Dispute Resolution - A "demonstrative judgment and mediation connection mechanism" has been established to assist in resolving collective disputes, allowing for centralized mediation based on effective court judgments [5].