七部门重磅文件，最新解读！

Core Viewpoint - The joint issuance of the policy measures by seven departments aims to enhance venture capital's role in supporting technological innovation, which has garnered significant attention from the private equity and venture capital sectors [1][3]. Group 1: Policy Measures Overview - The policy measures provide a comprehensive financial service framework for technological innovation, covering the entire lifecycle from research and development to the growth of small and medium-sized tech enterprises [3]. - The introduction of the "National Venture Capital Guidance Fund" is a key initiative aimed at supporting technological innovation and addressing the mismatch between R&D cycles and capital return cycles [6][7]. - The measures also include expanding the pilot scope of Asset Investment Companies (AIC) to facilitate the participation of long-term capital from banks, insurance, and social security funds in venture capital [5][8]. Group 2: Financial Ecosystem and Support - The policy is seen as a milestone in building China's technology finance system, creating a full-chain financial service ecosystem to resolve structural contradictions between technological innovation and capital supply [3][4]. - The measures encourage the introduction of long-term capital to reduce funding costs and improve the stability and risk resistance of venture capital institutions [8][9]. - The optimization of state-owned venture capital assessments aims to shift focus from short-term returns to long-term value, promoting investment in high-growth tech enterprises [10][11]. Group 3: Exit Mechanisms and Capital Flow - The introduction of innovative exit mechanisms, such as private equity share transfer trials and the development of secondary market funds (S Funds), aims to enhance liquidity and efficiency in venture capital exits [11][12]. - The policy encourages the establishment of diverse exit channels to improve capital flow and attract more social capital into the venture capital sector [11][12]. - The measures also emphasize the importance of a clear boundary for the error-correction mechanism to prevent reckless investment decisions while encouraging bold support for high-risk tech enterprises [10][11].