智驾险需厘清权责边界

Core Insights - The emergence of smart driving insurance as a new protection product has garnered industry attention, with companies like Jiyue, Hongmeng Zhixing, and Avita launching smart driving insurance services to cover losses related to smart driving assistance functions [1] - Smart driving insurance is currently positioned more as a value-added service rather than a traditional insurance product, leading to a development dilemma due to annual costs in the thousands of yuan and disputes over responsibilities [1] - Consumers have raised concerns about the motivations behind automakers' involvement in smart driving insurance, suggesting that it may shift the liability for system defects to insurance companies while allowing automakers to optimize algorithms based on claims data [1] Group 1 - The lack of a clear responsibility recognition system is a major issue, as current traffic safety laws do not establish standards for "human-machine responsibility" in smart driving accidents, leading to disputes over "system failure" versus "operational error" [1] - Automakers' monopolistic control over driving data exacerbates the risk of unfair responsibility determination, as they participate in the determination process while retaining original data [1] - There is a significant overlap between the coverage of smart driving insurance and traditional car insurance, leading to instances of redundant coverage [1] Group 2 - The iteration of smart driving technology is reshaping traditional car insurance logic, presenting three challenges for insurance pricing: the shift of risk from drivers to smart driving systems, rapid technological changes increasing risk variables, and the lack of unified responsibility recognition standards [2] - To build a healthy ecosystem for smart driving insurance, collaboration among multiple parties is essential, including clarifying responsibility boundaries for different levels of autonomous driving and establishing technical standards for accident assessment [2] - Smart driving insurance should evolve from mere loss compensation to risk prevention, with some automakers exploring innovative service models that monitor user behavior data and offer premium refunds for compliant usage [2]