Workflow
兆威机电: 北京金诚同达(深圳)律师事务所关于深圳市兆威机电股份有限公司2024年年度股东会的法律意见书

Core Viewpoint - The legal opinion letter from Beijing Jincheng Tongda (Shenzhen) Law Firm confirms the legality and validity of the procedures and results of the 2024 annual shareholders' meeting of Shenzhen Zhaowei Electromechanical Co., Ltd. Group 1: Meeting Procedures - The shareholders' meeting was convened based on a resolution from the company's third board of directors and announced on April 29, 2025 [2][3] - The meeting adopted a combination of on-site and online voting methods, allowing shareholders to vote through the Shenzhen Stock Exchange trading system and internet voting system [3][5] - The on-site meeting took place on May 19, 2025, at a specified location in Shenzhen [3][5] Group 2: Attendance and Qualifications - A total of 302 participants attended the meeting, representing 160,387,528 shares, which is 66.7715% of the total voting shares [5][6] - Among the attendees, 299 were small shareholders, representing 6,969,928 shares, or 2.9017% of the total voting shares [6] - The qualifications of the attendees and the convenor of the meeting were verified to comply with relevant laws and regulations [5][6] Group 3: Proposals Discussed - The meeting reviewed several proposals, including the repurchase and cancellation of certain restricted stocks, performance evaluations for directors and senior management, and the issuance of H shares for listing on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange [7][8] - Specific proposals included the annual report, financial statements, and various governance and management system amendments [7][8] Group 4: Voting Results - The voting results showed overwhelming support for all proposals, with approval rates generally exceeding 99.9% for key items such as the annual report and the issuance of H shares [9][10][11] - For instance, the proposal regarding the 2024 annual report received 99.9647% approval [9] - The proposal for the issuance of H shares also received 99.9663% approval [11][12] Group 5: Conclusion - The legal opinion concludes that the meeting's procedures, attendance qualifications, and voting processes were in compliance with the Company Law and relevant regulations, affirming the legitimacy of the meeting outcomes [17][18]