富创精密: 北京市中伦律师事务所关于沈阳富创精密设备股份有限公司2024年年度股东大会的法律意见书

Core Viewpoint - The legal opinion letter confirms that the 2024 annual shareholders' meeting of Shenyang Fuchuang Precision Equipment Co., Ltd. was convened and conducted in accordance with relevant laws and regulations, ensuring the legality and validity of the meeting and its resolutions [1][10]. Group 1: Meeting Procedures - The board of directors announced the 2024 annual shareholders' meeting on April 30, 2025, detailing the time, location, participants, and agenda [2]. - The meeting was scheduled for May 21, 2025, with specific time slots for online voting [3]. Group 2: Attendance and Voting - A total of 105 representatives attended the meeting, representing 176,790,990 shares, which accounted for 58.0509% of the total voting shares [4]. - The legal opinion confirms that the qualifications of the attendees and the convenor were valid and in compliance with relevant laws and company regulations [5]. Group 3: Voting Results - The following resolutions were passed with significant majority votes: - The 2024 annual report was approved with 99.9590% in favor [6]. - The 2024 financial settlement report was also approved with 99.9590% in favor [6]. - The 2024 board work report received 99.9648% approval [6]. - The profit distribution plan for 2024 was approved with 99.9707% in favor [6]. - The authorization for the board to conduct mid-year dividends for 2025 was approved with 99.9750% in favor [6]. - The expected related party transactions for 2025 were approved with 99.9383% in favor [7]. - The expected external guarantees for 2025 were approved with 99.9544% in favor [8]. - The 2025 board remuneration proposal was approved with 99.9286% in favor [9]. - The 2024 supervisory board work report was approved with 99.9590% in favor [9]. - The 2025 supervisory remuneration proposal was approved with 99.9549% in favor [10]. Group 4: Conclusion - The legal opinion concludes that all aspects of the shareholders' meeting, including the convening, procedures, qualifications, and voting results, were in compliance with the law and the company's articles of association, rendering the resolutions valid [10].