Workflow
新华时评|学术浮躁之风必须狠刹
Xin Hua She·2025-05-22 08:23

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the need to curb the rising trend of academic superficiality, which undermines scientific integrity and harms the academic ecosystem [1][2] Group 1: Issues in Academic Research - Recent incidents, such as undergraduates publishing 14 SCI papers, highlight a growing trend of seeking quick results and superficial achievements in academia [1] - The pursuit of quantity over quality leads to the proliferation of low-quality, duplicate, and fraudulent research outputs, wasting societal resources and hindering effective technological innovation [1] Group 2: Evaluation System and Its Impact - An inadequate evaluation system is identified as a significant root cause of academic superficiality, where the focus is primarily on the number of papers and projects, affecting promotions and awards [1][2] - The current "number-based heroism" evaluation system imposes heavy pressure on researchers, making it difficult for them to engage in deep, meaningful research [1] Group 3: Recommendations for Improvement - To combat academic superficiality, there is a call for reforming the evaluation system to focus on innovation, quality, effectiveness, and contribution [2] - Establishing a supportive environment for researchers, including protections for young talent and a clear distinction between long-term breakthroughs and short-term results, is essential [2] - Strengthening the integrity of academic research through mechanisms that penalize misconduct is crucial for maintaining academic purity [2]