Core Viewpoint - Huaxi Biological criticized ten research reports from nine brokerages, claiming they misled the market by promoting a "hyaluronic acid obsolescence theory" in favor of recombinant collagen products [2][3][5] Group 1: Research Reports Criticism - Huaxi Biological specifically named four reports from brokerages including Huatai Securities and Anxin Securities, which emphasized the advantages of recombinant collagen over hyaluronic acid in terms of efficacy and safety [3][5] - The reports in question did not explicitly use the term "obsolete" but suggested that collagen had superior applications in certain scenarios [5] - Huaxi Biological's article indicated that the emergence of the "hyaluronic acid obsolescence" narrative was driven by "restless capital" seeking new investment themes [3][9] Group 2: Timeline and Context - The criticism of the research reports is rooted in a timeline starting from 2022, when the recombinant collagen concept gained traction in the capital market [7][10] - Huaxi Biological itself entered the recombinant collagen market in April 2022 by acquiring a 51% stake in Beijing Yierkang Biological Engineering for 233 million yuan [9] - The reports were published between 2022 and 2024, with the earliest being from August 2022 and the latest from February 2024 [8] Group 3: Regulatory and Compliance Issues - The article raised questions about the compliance and independence of the research reports, referencing the "Interim Regulations on the Release of Securities Research Reports" which mandates objectivity and fairness [10][11] - There were indications that some brokerages had deleted the criticized reports from the WIND platform, although they remained accessible on other platforms like Choice [5][11] - The production process of research reports involves ensuring data legality and undergoing compliance checks before publication, highlighting the importance of rigorous standards in the industry [11]