Group 1 - The core event involved President Trump accusing South Africa of "white genocide" during a meeting with President Ramaphosa, which shocked the South African leader and was seen as a significant diplomatic misstep [1][3][4] - The White House had meticulously planned this "ambush," with large screens brought in to display a video that included inflammatory speeches against white South Africans, catching Ramaphosa off guard [3][4] - Following the video, Trump presented printed articles claiming to support his accusations, indicating a premeditated agenda to promote his narrative despite Ramaphosa's attempts to discuss trade and geopolitical issues [4][5] Group 2 - Ramaphosa's response to the accusations was calm and composed, emphasizing that the South African government does not endorse any form of genocide and operates under a multi-party democracy [5][6] - The incident has been characterized by various media outlets as a "trap," raising concerns about the political risks for foreign leaders visiting the White House and potentially affecting future diplomatic relations [6][7] - The event has led to discussions about the changing dynamics of U.S. foreign policy, with implications that such confrontational tactics may deter allies from engaging with the U.S. [7]
特朗普会见时突然发难,折射美外交政策反复无常,南非总统遭“白宫伏击”引哗然
Huan Qiu Shi Bao·2025-05-22 22:51