外交部回应美政府禁止哈佛招收国际生

Core Viewpoint - The U.S. government has revoked Harvard University's eligibility for the Student and Exchange Visitor Program (SEVP), prohibiting the school from enrolling international students, which significantly impacts the university's international student population and academic operations [3][4][5]. Group 1: Impact on International Students - Harvard University has approximately 6,793 international students for the 2024-2025 academic year, accounting for 27.2% of its total student body, many of whom hold F-1 or J-1 visas and must transfer to avoid losing their legal status [4]. - The revocation of SEVP certification forces current international students to choose between transferring, changing their immigration status, or leaving the U.S., with failure to transfer resulting in illegal status [4][5]. - The loss of international students is expected to disrupt research projects and laboratory operations, as these students are integral to Harvard's research community [4]. Group 2: Broader Implications for Harvard University - The decision to revoke Harvard's SEVP status is described as a retaliatory action by the Trump administration, which could severely damage the university's academic and research missions [3][6]. - The university faces a potential loss of new international students for the upcoming academic year, leading to a significant decline in enrollment and revenue, as well as a reputational crisis on a global scale [5][6]. - Harvard has indicated that the government's actions are illegal and harmful, and it is taking steps to provide guidance and support to affected community members [3][4]. Group 3: Government Actions and Responses - The U.S. Department of Homeland Security stated that the revocation serves as a warning to all universities and academic institutions regarding compliance with federal laws [3]. - Harvard has been under scrutiny for its policies and has faced threats of funding cuts, with the government previously freezing $2.2 billion in federal funding and an additional $450 million in grants due to non-compliance with reform requests [10][11]. - The university has initiated legal action against the government, claiming that the attempts to manipulate its academic decisions through funding cuts are unlawful [10].