Core Viewpoint - The regulatory authorities are intensifying efforts to address the issue of non-operational fund occupation by controlling shareholders of listed companies, emphasizing the need for timely repayment and accountability [1][2][3]. Group 1: Regulatory Actions - The Shanghai Stock Exchange has issued work letters to four companies, including ST Dongshi and ST Huamei, urging them to recover non-operational funds occupied by controlling shareholders [1]. - The new "National Nine Articles" highlights a strict approach to rectify financial fraud and fund occupation, with a focus on enhancing regulatory measures [1][2]. - The China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) is taking a zero-tolerance stance against fund occupation, with significant penalties imposed on companies like ST Huamei, which faced fines totaling 42.8 million yuan [2]. Group 2: Rectification and Compliance - The revised delisting rules under the new "National Nine Articles" include provisions for companies that fail to rectify significant fund occupation issues within a specified timeframe, potentially leading to delisting [3]. - ST Xintong was subjected to delisting risk warnings due to its failure to resolve fund occupation issues within the designated six-month rectification period [3]. - Companies like ST Huamei and ST Dongshi are under pressure to repay occupied funds or face delisting procedures [3]. Group 3: Accountability Post-Delisting - Companies that face delisting due to operational failures or financial irregularities are still required to fulfill their repayment obligations for occupied funds [4]. - ST Yangguang, which encountered trading delisting, is being urged to recover occupied funds even after its delisting [4]. - The CSRC has initiated investigations into companies like ST Longyu, which reported significant fund occupation issues, emphasizing that delisting does not exempt them from repayment responsibilities [4]. Group 4: Investor Protection and Legal Actions - Companies are encouraged to take proactive measures to recover funds from controlling shareholders, with several firms already initiating lawsuits against them [5][6]. - Independent directors are playing a crucial role in monitoring and urging companies to address fund occupation issues [6]. - The investor protection center has successfully facilitated legal actions, such as the case against ST Moden, where the court ruled in favor of the company regarding fund recovery [6].
占用必须还、整改有期限、退市不免责!大股东资金占用整改进行时