Core Viewpoint - The recent increase in terminated share transfer agreements among listed companies highlights a dual nature in the market, where some companies continue to pursue strategic investments while others face regulatory scrutiny and market conditions that hinder transactions [2][5][6]. Group 1: Market Dynamics - In May, 13 listed companies announced the termination of share transfer agreements, a significant increase compared to previous months, which typically saw only three to five cases [5]. - The reasons for termination often include incomplete procedures and market conditions where previously set transfer prices are now below current market values [5][6]. - Despite the rise in terminations, there are still ongoing agreements aimed at introducing strategic investors or changing actual controllers, indicating that the market remains active [7][8]. Group 2: Regulatory Environment - The tightening of regulations following the introduction of new reduction rules has led to increased scrutiny of share transfer agreements, with calls for clearer prohibitions on certain behaviors to prevent gray operations [3][9]. - The market is seeing a trend where parties involved in agreements are extending lock-up periods to enhance compliance and reduce the risk of speculative trading [10][11]. Group 3: Strategic Implications - Protocol transfers serve as an effective tool for major shareholders to meet liquidity needs while avoiding direct impacts on stock prices from secondary market sales [6][8]. - The presence of financial investors as transferees is becoming more challenging, but agreements aimed at strategic partnerships continue to progress normally [8]. - The market's dual characteristics suggest a need for balance between resource allocation functions and risk prevention in the context of share transfers [3][10].