特朗普 被紧急叫停！

Core Viewpoint - Harvard University has achieved a preliminary victory in a significant legal battle against the Trump administration, obtaining a temporary order from the court to block a government directive that would limit the admission of international students, which could have widespread implications for the U.S. higher education system [2][3] Group 1: Legal Developments - A federal judge ruled that the government cannot enforce the recently issued ban on international students at Harvard, stating that the directive could cause "immediate and irreparable harm" to the university [2] - Harvard filed a lawsuit against the U.S. government, claiming that the directive infringes on the university's rights to free speech and due process, and does not comply with federal regulations [3] - The temporary restraining order (TRO) will remain in effect until a court hearing on Harvard's request for a permanent injunction, scheduled for May 29 [3] Group 2: Impact on International Students - Approximately 27% of Harvard's student body consists of international students, totaling around 6,800 individuals, a significant increase from 19.6% in 2006 [3] - The government's directive has created uncertainty for thousands of foreign students, affecting both current and admitted students who are now unsure of their next steps [3][4] - The directive could deter international students from pursuing education in the U.S., despite no similar measures being taken against other universities [4] Group 3: Government's Position - The U.S. government justified its actions against Harvard by citing concerns over the university's handling of anti-Semitism and the need for stricter oversight of foreign students [2][3] - A White House spokesperson indicated that if Harvard were more concerned about addressing issues related to anti-American sentiments on campus, they would not be in this situation [3] - The Department of Homeland Security emphasized that admitting foreign students is a privilege, not a right, and criticized Harvard's lawsuit as an attempt to undermine presidential authority [3] Group 4: Financial Implications - Harvard's endowment, valued at $53 billion, is largely earmarked for specific uses, and the potential loss of its tax-exempt status could have significant financial repercussions for the university [4] - The government's directive implies that Harvard may not be able to admit any new international students for at least two academic years, which could further impact its financial stability [4] Group 5: Reactions from Other Institutions - Other universities, such as the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, have begun to extend invitations to Harvard's current and admitted students in light of the situation [5] - MIT's president expressed shock at the government's directive, stating that it undermines the spirit of excellence and innovation in the U.S. [5]