Di Yi Cai Jing·2025-05-26 03:02Core Insights - The recent release of Google's video model Veo 3 has generated significant discussion, particularly due to its ability to create realistic characters and scenes, but users express that the technology is not as groundbreaking as some claims suggest [3][4][12] - Veo 3 introduces a native audio generation feature, allowing for simultaneous creation of sound effects and dialogue, marking a shift from previous silent video generation models [4][7] - Despite improvements, industry experts highlight that Veo 3 still has many flaws and is not yet suitable for large-scale commercial production [12][15][17] Group 1: Technology and Features - Veo 3's key innovation is its ability to generate audio alongside video, which enhances the overall production quality and efficiency [4][7] - The model allows for a streamlined workflow where text prompts can generate complete animated videos, including music and voice synchronization [7][15] - Users have reported that while the video quality has improved, it does not meet the high expectations set by earlier versions, and there are still issues with consistency and accuracy [12][14] Group 2: Market Reception and Cost - The cost of using Veo 3 is relatively high, requiring a subscription to Google's AI ultra plan at $249.99 per month, which is more expensive than competing services [16] - Users have noted that the points system for video generation can lead to additional costs, making it less feasible for commercial projects without purchasing extra credits [16][17] - Despite the high costs and existing flaws, some industry professionals see potential in Veo 3 and its associated tools like FLOW for future AI-driven video production workflows [17]