中国驻澳大使：澳方收回达尔文港，在道义上欠妥

Group 1 - The core issue revolves around the Darwin Port lease agreement between China's Landbridge Group and the Northern Territory government, which was obtained through a public bidding process and complies with Australian laws and market rules [1] - Australian Prime Minister Albanese mentioned that the government has been formulating a plan to address the port issue and has engaged in informal negotiations with potential buyers [1][3] - Landbridge Group has made significant investments in the port's infrastructure and operations over the past decade, turning the port from a loss-making entity to a profitable one, contributing positively to the local economy [1][4] Group 2 - The Australian government, under the 2020 Foreign Relations Act, has the authority to veto agreements made by state governments with foreign entities based on national security concerns [3] - Landbridge Group's non-executive director, Terry O'Connor, stated that the company has no intention of selling the port and has not engaged in any negotiations regarding its sale [3] - Concerns regarding national security risks associated with the port have been dismissed by O'Connor, who emphasized that there have been no actual risks or concerns in the past decade [4] Group 3 - Local leaders and experts have expressed that reclaiming Darwin Port could damage investor confidence and the Northern Territory's economy, highlighting the port's significance as one of the few operational projects in the area [4][5] - The relationship between China and Australia is framed as a comprehensive strategic partnership, with calls for a fair and transparent business environment for Chinese enterprises in Australia [5]