抑制“赌风格追热点” 浮动费率基金锚定目标拼业绩

Core Viewpoint - A new batch of floating rate funds has been approved and is being launched, emphasizing both holding duration and excess returns, with the previous batch achieving positive returns and some exceeding 30% [1][2] Group 1: Performance of Previous Funds - The previous batch of eight floating rate funds has been established for about a year and a half, all achieving positive returns, with an average return slightly outperforming the performance benchmark [1] - Notable funds such as Dazhong Zhixin and Yinhua Huixiang have reported excess returns, with Dazhong Zhixin achieving over 30% return and an excess return rate exceeding 20% compared to its benchmark [2] Group 2: Fee Structure and Management - The fee structure for the new floating rate funds includes a fixed management fee of 0.6%, a contingent management fee of 0.6%, and an excess management fee of 0.3%, with varying rates based on performance relative to benchmarks [4] - The management fees are directly linked to performance, incentivizing fund managers to focus on absolute returns and adjust their investment strategies accordingly [3][4] Group 3: Investment Strategy and Discipline - The new fee structure emphasizes the importance of performance benchmarks, requiring fund managers to pay attention to industry deviations, style exposures, and tracking errors to avoid style drift [5][6] - Fund managers are encouraged to adopt a disciplined approach to investment, focusing on fundamental research and risk control rather than short-term speculative behaviors [6] Group 4: Industry Implications - The new floating rate funds are expected to enhance the alignment of interests between fund managers and investors, promoting long-term investment and reducing impulsive trading behaviors [4][5] - The regulatory push for performance-based fee structures is likely to drive a shift in the industry from scale-driven to research-driven performance, fostering a competitive environment that prioritizes quality [4][6]