美法院叫停 特朗普关税战凉了？

Core Viewpoint - The U.S. International Trade Court ruled that the Trump administration's tariff policies are illegal, specifically those implemented under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, and ordered the cessation of these measures [1][2][5]. Group 1: Court Ruling - The court's ruling prohibits the Trump administration from executing tariff measures based on the International Emergency Economic Powers Act [1][2]. - The ruling states that if these tariff orders are deemed illegal for the plaintiffs, they are illegal for everyone [3]. Group 2: Implications for Trade Policy - The ruling represents a significant judicial setback for the Trump administration, potentially undermining the legal foundation of its tariff strategy during the second term [5]. - Experts believe that the ruling complicates ongoing negotiations with trade partners, as it may lead them to halt further concessions until the legal situation is clarified [5]. - The ruling grants foreign governments new leverage in trade negotiations against the U.S. [5]. Group 3: Government Response - The White House criticized the ruling, claiming that trade deficits constitute a national emergency that should not be decided by unelected judges [6]. - The Trump administration has already appealed the court's decision, questioning the court's authority [6]. Group 4: Ongoing Legal Challenges - There are at least five pending lawsuits related to Trump's tariff policies, initiated by small businesses and several states, arguing that the government lacks the authority to impose such tariffs without congressional approval [7].