Workflow
网红大桥底下“圈地收费”,有哪些问题需要说清楚| 新京报快评
Xin Lang Cai Jing·2025-05-29 08:34

Core Viewpoint - The controversy surrounding the Yangsigang Changjiang Bridge's under-bridge space charging fees has raised questions about the legality and appropriateness of such practices in light of local regulations [2][3][6]. Group 1: Incident Overview - A music venue named Jiangying Yangsigang City Light Music Society has been accused of charging a deposit of 100 yuan for entry, which some netizens claim is a form of forced consumption [2]. - The local urban management bureau stated that the deposit is refundable after the visit, indicating that there is no actual fee for entry [2]. - The conflicting reports from the music venue and the urban management bureau have left the public uncertain about the actual practices in place [2]. Group 2: Regulatory Context - According to the 2017 "Wuhan City Bridge and Tunnel Safety Management Regulations," under-bridge spaces can be used for public welfare purposes but cannot charge fees [3]. - The local city investment group has stated that the under-bridge commercial area is encouraged by the government, which has sparked public interest and debate [3]. - There is a need for clarity on what constitutes public welfare use, particularly regarding the allowance of commercial activities in these spaces [3][5]. Group 3: Safety and Usage Regulations - Various cities, including Shenzhen and Chongqing, have strict regulations prohibiting commercial activities in under-bridge spaces to ensure safety and prevent hazards [5]. - Wuhan's regulations also emphasize that any use of under-bridge spaces must not compromise safety, requiring approval from relevant urban management departments [5]. - The ongoing activities of the music venue and the deposit collection practice warrant a thorough review by local authorities to address public concerns [6].