白宫怒批联邦法官阻止特朗普关税政策 称将上诉至最高法院

Core Viewpoint - The White House strongly criticized federal court rulings that blocked President Trump's global tariff policy, labeling the decisions as "judicial overreach" and calling for Supreme Court intervention [1][2]. Group 1: Legal Challenges - The U.S. International Trade Court ruled that Trump's global tariff policy is "illegal," stating that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act does not grant the president unlimited authority to impose tariffs [1]. - The federal appeals court has temporarily stayed the enforcement of this ruling, allowing the tariff policy to continue for now, while the White House has filed an appeal against the decision [1]. Group 2: Political Context - White House spokesperson Levitt criticized the judges, appointed by past presidents, as "radical judges" who are abusing judicial power and undermining the president's mandate from the public [2]. - The Republican-controlled Senate recently rejected a bipartisan proposal aimed at blocking Trump's tariff policy, which failed with a tie vote of 49-49 [2]. Group 3: Economic Strategy - Levitt emphasized that Trump's legal basis for imposing tariffs is sound and necessary for national security, arguing that the U.S. must enhance domestic manufacturing capabilities and reduce reliance on foreign adversaries [2]. - Despite legal obstacles, the administration plans to continue pursuing its trade agenda, indicating that the president has other legal authorities to implement tariffs [3].