更利于科技工作者做自由探索 科技人才试点工作初见成效→
Yang Shi Xin Wen Ke Hu Duan·2025-05-31 13:38

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the ongoing reform of the evaluation system for scientific and technological talents in China, emphasizing the importance of innovation and contribution over traditional metrics like publication count [2][6]. Group 1: Evaluation Reform Implementation - The Ministry of Science and Technology and eight other departments initiated a pilot program for talent evaluation reform in September 2022, involving six regions and 21 universities and research institutions [2]. - Shanghai University is one of the pilot units, where a new evaluation mechanism focusing on innovation quality and contribution is being implemented [4]. Group 2: Research and Development Focus - At Shanghai University, interdisciplinary teams are formed to tackle complex mechanical problems, showcasing a collaborative approach to research [2]. - Young researcher Li Mengjiao from the Microelectronics Institute is engaged in advanced integrated circuit research, benefiting from a six-year evaluation period that emphasizes resource coordination rather than solely focusing on publications [8]. Group 3: Policy and Standards Development - The Ministry of Science and Technology reports that over 50 policy documents have been issued to support the pilot program, enhancing the evaluation autonomy of trial units [10]. - More than 100 institutional documents related to the evaluation reform have been published or revised by the 21 pilot universities and research institutions [11]. Group 4: Evaluation Criteria - The current evaluation framework categorizes talents based on their research focus, with specific criteria for basic research, applied research, and social welfare research [13]. - Over 90% of central pilot units are implementing long-term evaluations of 6 to 10 years for basic research and young scientific talents, aligning evaluations with national strategic needs [13]. Group 5: Future Directions - The Ministry of Science and Technology plans to develop policy documents to further refine industry talent evaluation standards and norms [15].