两天收到同案相反“判决”，真的只是法官失误?

Core Viewpoint - The incident involving contradictory court rulings in Xinyang, Henan has sparked significant public concern regarding judicial integrity and procedural errors within the court system [2][3][4] Group 1: Incident Overview - Two contradictory rulings were delivered to the plaintiff's lawyer within two days, with the first ruling lacking an official seal, rendering it legally ineffective [2] - The case in question involves a stock transfer dispute with a compensation amount of 5 million yuan [2] - The presiding judge acknowledged the mistake, attributing it to a failure in the judicial process, as the initial draft was mistakenly sent out without proper validation [2] Group 2: Judicial Process Concerns - The incident raises questions about the internal review processes of the court, as the initial draft should have undergone multiple checks before being sent out [2][3] - There are indications that the two rulings may not only differ in outcome but also in the reasoning provided, suggesting potential procedural irregularities [3] - A similar incident occurred in 2018 in Hubei, where a judge issued a contradictory ruling after expressing doubts about the initial decision, highlighting ongoing issues within the judicial review process [3] Group 3: Public Trust and Accountability - The contradictory rulings could lead to public skepticism regarding the fairness and impartiality of the judicial system [4] - A thorough investigation is deemed necessary to clarify the reasons behind the conflicting judgments and to restore public confidence in the judiciary [4] - Addressing these issues is crucial for maintaining the court's credibility and responding to public expectations for justice [4]