人民时评：以法治之力打击山寨食品

Core Viewpoint - The effectiveness of governance depends on the precision of measures taken to address issues such as "near infringement" and "substantial similarity" in legal concepts, suggesting the need for more operational identification standards [1] Group 1: Governance Measures - It is proposed to include implicit infringement factors such as packaging and color combinations into regulatory scope [1] - A key aspect of governance is to establish a punitive system where "illegal costs > illegal gains" [1] - Consideration should be given to adding relevant clauses in laws to impose higher fines and punitive damages for intentional and repeated infringement in counterfeit food cases [1] Group 2: Legal and Administrative Framework - There is a need to improve the dual connection mechanism between administrative and criminal penalties to achieve a seamless integration of punishment [1] - The goal is to realize a synergistic effect where "1 + 1 > 2" in terms of punitive outcomes [1] Group 3: Collaborative Governance - Addressing counterfeit food issues should not be a solitary effort by regulators but should involve multi-stakeholder collaboration [1] - The government should enforce regulations, companies should enhance self-discipline, platforms should maintain strict oversight, the public should participate in supervision, and industry organizations should fulfill their responsibilities [1]