沈建光：厘清稳定币认识的六大误区

Core Insights - The article emphasizes the need to clarify misconceptions about stablecoins and to recognize their functional attributes and strategic value, particularly in the context of developing offshore and onshore RMB stablecoins [1][2]. Group 1: Market Growth and Regulatory Landscape - Since the second half of 2023, the stablecoin market has entered a rapid growth phase, with a current market size exceeding $230 billion and over 250 million active accounts [1]. - Various countries, including the EU, Japan, Singapore, the UAE, and Hong Kong, have introduced regulations to support stablecoin innovation, with more than ten major countries planning related legislative initiatives by 2025 [1]. - The recent passage of the "GENIUS Act" in the U.S. Senate significantly increases the likelihood of further development in the stablecoin market [1]. Group 2: Misconceptions about Stablecoins - Misconception 1: Stablecoins are equated with general cryptocurrencies, overlooking their unique characteristics and governance mechanisms [3][4]. - Misconception 2: The belief that stablecoins lack stability is challenged by the fact that most stablecoins are backed by fiat currencies or assets, with the highest stability observed in fiat-backed stablecoins [5][6]. - Misconception 3: The notion that stablecoins conflict with central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) is addressed by highlighting their complementary roles in different transaction scenarios [9][10]. Group 3: Regulatory Developments and Transparency - Regulatory frameworks for stablecoin issuers are being established globally, focusing on aspects such as licensing, operational management, and reserve asset investment [8]. - Major stablecoin issuers are improving transparency and compliance, with USDC being a notable example of regular independent audits and reserve disclosures [7][8]. - The "GENIUS Act" in the U.S. sets specific capital, liquidity, and risk management requirements for stablecoin issuers, enhancing the stability of the market [8]. Group 4: Impact on Monetary Sovereignty and Internationalization - Concerns about stablecoins undermining domestic monetary sovereignty can be mitigated through regulatory measures that restrict their domestic use and manage reserve assets [13][14]. - The development of RMB stablecoins is positioned as a new engine for promoting the internationalization of the RMB, complementing existing cross-border payment systems [15][16]. - The potential of stablecoins to enhance the efficiency of cross-border payments is highlighted, with significant advantages over traditional banking systems [10][16]. Group 5: Addressing Illegal Financial Activities - The perception that stablecoins exacerbate illegal financial activities is countered by advancements in anti-money laundering (AML) technologies and regulatory frameworks [19][20]. - Blockchain technology can be utilized for monitoring stablecoin transactions, enabling regulatory bodies to track the flow of funds effectively [20][21]. - Global AML regulations are evolving to include stablecoins and cryptocurrencies, with specific compliance requirements being established in various jurisdictions [21].